LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  April 1996

ARLIS-L April 1996

Subject:

PCC Core Bib. Record for AV (Pt. 1 of 3 -- cover sheet)

From:

"Eric R. Childress" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ART LIBRARIES SOCIETY DISCUSSION LIST <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:59:07 EDT

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (187 lines)

----------------------------Original message----------------------------

PCC CBR-AV Task Group

LONG VERSION: Pt. 1 of 3 messages -- Cover Sheet
(Pt. 2. PCC CBR-MI/draft/2P)
(Pt. 3. PCC CBR-MI/draft/2P)

April 21, 1996

FROM: The PROGRAM FOR COOPERATIVE CATALOGING Core Bibliographic
Record for Audiovisual Materials Task Group (PCC CBR-AV Task Group)


SUBJECT: Request for comments on 2nd draft of the proposed core
cataloging standards for:

     1.  Moving Image Materials    (PCC CBR-MI/draft/2P)

     2.  Graphic Materials         (PCC CBR-GR/draft/2P)

ALSO: In addition to forwarding final drafts of the MI and GR
proposed standards to the PCC for acceptance, the PCC CBR-AV Task
Group will forward recommendations on desirable changes to AACR2,
LCRIs, and USMARC.  These recommendations will be considered by the
PCC, and, if approved, will be forwarded to the appropriate bodies
for consideration. The task group welcomes concisely written
suggestions along these lines from the community.


DEADLINE FOR ALL COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:  Sunday, April 28, 1996.


SEND COMMENTS TO:  Eric Childress, Chair, PCC CBR-AV Task Group,
via e-mail at the Task Group's comments address:

     [log in to unmask]

or via fax:  (910) 538-6547

****
Below:

WHAT IS A "CORE" BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD?
BACKGROUND ON PCC CORE RECORD STANDARDS
THE PCC CBR-AV TASK GROUP
SUGGESTIONS TO REVIEWERS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

*****


WHAT IS A "CORE" BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD?

     A "core" bibliographic record is one created to a new level of
completeness, a level that is greater than minimal, yet less than
full. PCC core-level records:

     1. are identifiable (a special code appears in the USMARC 042
field)
     2. meet specific requirements (i.e., comply with the official
PCC core record standards, standards which require the inclusion of
a minimum of key elements of information)
     3. have all names and series and LCSH access points under
national authority control.
     4. are dynamic -- the institution which creates the original
core record may choose to exceed the core standard, and, other
authorized PCC institutions may choose to enrich existing PCC core
records (e.g., by adding or expanding notes, adding additional
access points, etc.)
     5. offer individual institutions greater flexibility in
tailoring local cataloging practice to local needs and priorities.


BACKGROUND ON PCC CORE RECORD STANDARDS:

     The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) is an
international cooperative effort aimed at increasing access to
library collections by providing useful, timely, and cost-effective
cataloging that meets mutually-accepted standards.

     A continuing PCC project is the formulation of official PCC
standards for "core" bibliographic records (the concept of a "core
record" is explained above), and to date three task groups have
completed definitions of PCC core record standards for:

     1. Books (PCC CBR-BK)*

     2. Vernacular additions to bibliographic records for
               non-Roman alphabets (PCC CBR-JACKPHY)

     3. Printed and Manuscript Music (PCC CBR-MU)*

     4. Music and Non-Music Sound Recordings (PCC CBR-SR)*

*Note: these core record standards are currently undergoing
revision to accommodate changes arising from USMARC format
integration.


THE PCC CBR-AV TASK GROUP:

     Members of the PCC CBR-AV Task Group:  Eric Childress (Elon
College), chair; Diane Boehr (Costabile Associates) ; Nancy
Erickson (Minnesota Historical Society); Jane Dunbar Johnson (UCLA
Film and Television Archive); Glenn Patton (OCLC).

     Liaisons to the PCC CBR-AV Task Group:  PCC Standards
Committee liaison: Joan Schuitema (Northwestern University);
LC RCCD: Ann Della Porta; LC CPSO: Harriet Harrison;
LC MPBS: Stephen Kharfen.

     The task group is charged to "define the minimum set of data
elements for audiovisual materials [i.e., works that fall within
the scope of AACR2 chapters 7 & 8]...that will serve to streamline
the cataloging of such materials and still meet the basic needs of
as wide a range of cooperative institutions as possible."

     First drafts of the proposed MI and GR core standards were
distributed for comment in December 1995.  Since that time the task
group has revised the proposed cores to incorporate comments
from the AV-related cataloging communities and is now making 2nd
drafts proposed core record standards available for comment.

     A final version of each AV standard along with a report from
the task group will forwarded to the PCC Executive Board by early
May, 1996.  Formal adoption and distribution of the two AV core
standards should take place later in 1996.


SUGGESTIONS TO REVIEWERS:

     In reviewing the draft standards, readers should be aware
of these underlying principles/assumptions:

     1. PCC core standards define the *minimum* elements that must
be present in a core record (all mandatory elements + those
mandatory-if-applicable elements that apply in the individual
case).

     2. Dynamic enhancement:  Core records are assumed to be
dynamic rather than static -- as core records appear on the
bibliographic networks, authorized PCC institutions using core
records are always free to enrich the records.  Over time an
individual core record may be repeatedly and permanently enriched
with expanded/additional notes, additional access points, etc.

     3. Justification of access points:  PCC core records do *not*
require that access points be justified by information present
elsewhere in the record.

     4. Training:  Official PCC core records may only be created by
PCC institutions that have gone through a training process. The
training familiarizes catalogers with the particulars of properly
applying each core standard and emphasizes the value of individual
cataloger judgement.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

     Information about the PCC is available on the PCC's WWW Home
Page <http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/pcc.html>.

     If you received this message via an Internet list, copies of
the 2nd draft of the proposed AV core standards will be
automatically distributed to this list.  If you wish to receive
additional copies of the proposed 2nd draft standards, please
direct a request to the task group <[log in to unmask]>.  Please
specify whether the proposed standard for moving image materials
and/or the proposed standard for graphic materials is desired.

     Queries concerning PCC membership requirements may be
directed to: Ann Della Porta, Library of Congress Regional and
Cooperative Cataloging Division <[log in to unmask]>

     Queries concerning the proposed AV Materials core standards
should be directed to the PCC CBR-AV Task Group chair,
Eric Childress, Elon College.




Eric Childress                                  Elon College Library
Special Materials Cataloger                     P.O. Box 187
[log in to unmask]                         Elon College, NC 27244
(910) 538-6544 voice                            (910) 538-6547 fax

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager