----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Our University Library and another university library in our province several years ago now applied for and received funding to jointly develop collections in environmental design. I had a fairly large amount of money to spend over about 5 years on monographs that were to complement not duplicate the other library's collection. I too saw the need to have some titles in our collection which duplicated the other library's collection. I did buy the titles that were in the "must have" category. My rationale was that a library (especially the size of our two institutions together) would normally carry more than one copy of these core titles and it only made sense that in a distributed situation that copies would be housed at each location. Hope this helps your case. Marilyn -- Marilyn Nasserden Fine Arts, Music, and Environmental Design Librarian University of Calgary Library Phone: (403) 220-3795 Office: MLT 918 E-mail: [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask] wrote: > ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > > Hello again, > > This seems to be my week for posting questions to the list... > > I was wondering about some of the acquisitions policies of those of you > who are involved in consortiums. We have always observed loan policies > for the other institutions in our consortium, but now we are being asked > not to duplicate, or at least consider that, titles that the other colleges > already own. Of course, I can see some advantage to this, but also see some > more problematic issues emerging, such as the strength of our individual > collection, the ability to use materials for reserve or long term research > loans, and the serious loss of that serendipitous element of research that > is so related to picking something off the shelf that just happens to be > next to the item you found in the catalog. > > So, what do you think? Perhaps this subject is broad enough in appeal that > you might just reply to the list. > > Thanks, > > Anne