Print

Print


> I'm forwarding this message on behalf of Vicki Bohm.   Thanks, Vicki.
>
> Danny Fermon
> Assistant Librarian
> Museum of Modern Art Library
> [log in to unmask]
> (212) 708-9434
>
>
>
> Minutes--New York Catalogers--Meeting January 6, 1999--Bard Graduate
> Center
>                 Hostess = Greta Earnest, Chief Librarian
>
> Preliminaries
>
> 1. Tour of the current exhibition "India : a Jewelry Spectrum" by Nicole
> Linderman
>
>  A tour of the exhibition of jewelry, mainly silver and gold, from all
> parts of India with excellent commentary by Nicole Linderman.
>
> 2.  Quick history of BGC by Greta Earnest. Begun in 1993, one of 3 schools
> to offer an MA in decorative arts, as of 1998 BGC offers a PhD in
> decorative
> arts. Now at 18 West 86th, BGC is acquiring space at 38 West 86th and
> hopes to move
> the library there by 2000
>
> 3.  The Library has three professionals: Greta Earnest-Chief Librarian,
> Stephanie Sueppel-Serials and reference, Irina Kandarasheva-Tech services
> and
> reference.  The library is 6 years old, employs work-study students and
> hopes to
> employ paraprofessionals.  It has ca. 30,000 titles, 180 periodicals, 3600
> bound journals, and 60 videos.
>
> Meeting
>
> 1.  SACO workshop at ALA Midwinter in Philadelphia--register by 1/8/99
>      two workshops for co-op cat. = a.m. basic,  p.m. advanced
>      check website   lcweb.loc.gov/pcc/
>       there was brief discussion of current SACO pro's and con's
>
> 2.  Core records
>
> discussion about whether or not the minimal bib level with authority
> control really allowed for more-better-faster cataloging--how much clean
> up
> and/or enhancement was done at a later time, was it even necessary--did
> special
> libraries and specific subject areas in any library, need and use too many
> local headings
> to make core records advantageous?--were librarians or paraprofessionals
> doing
> copy-cataloging and how much were they expected to check authorities, do
> clean up,
> or just accept what was there?
>
> PCC training sessions useful or not? Most present who had attended one
> thought such sessions were useful.
>
> 3.  Local  standards
>
> discussion of 653 and 655 fields as well as the use of local headings,
> 650 4 vs. 690
>
> discussion  about the use of 500 fields for notes, "extra information"
> worth keeping but not really fitting into a regular subject or name field,
> searchable by keyword if nothing else
>
>
> 4.  Off-site storage
>
> Who uses it?   MOMA representatives offered views on their reasons,
> management and problems
>
> Space/staffing/type of library and circulation needs and
> statistics/aquisition policies budget = all factors
>
> 5.  Meeting ended with tentative plans for the next meeting to be held
> either on
> Monday, February 22nd or on Wednesday, February 24,  at either MOMA
> or FIT---------- representatives from those two institutions
> will e-mail decision
>
> Agreed upon  initial topic = report from ALA midwinter
>
> Any other desired topics =  e-mail Dan Fermon at  [log in to unmask]
>
> 6.  Final activity = tour of the BGC Library by Greta Earnest
>
> minutes by V.R. Bohm--Watson Library