 |
 |
Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=10061, phase=CONNECT, target=127.0.0.1:2306). The server is probably not started.
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- I think it's still worth collecting auction results for two reasons: first, it's a great convenience for the reader to find the auction results tipped in to the actual catalog, and second, the staff members who actually do the work are not being taken away from other, more pressing tasks to do so. However, given the point you make about the ready availability of such information, I'm wondering how much time we should spend chasing around after sales results which we have not received and how important it is that we record whether or not we have received the price list in our SCIPIO records. As Daniel notes, there is still the need to record pricing information for older catalogs which were priced by hand. >Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 17:50:37 EDT >From: Daniel Starr <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: auction results > >----------------------------Original message---------------------------- >Now that there are so many electronic indexes to auction results have any >libraries that collect auction catalogs stopped bothering to collect and >tip in auction results? Is the priced vs. not priced distinction still >useful to make for current catalogs? >Daniel Starr >Museum of Modern Art > >------------------------------ ************* Ann Leslie Jones 312-443-3526 (voice) Assistant Head of Technical Services 312-443-0849 (fax) Ryerson & Burnham Libraries [log in to unmask] The Art Institute of Chicago