 |
 |
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > Hello, > > I wanted to update everyone on the status of the proposal for the > Architecture Section to hold a discussion session in addition to our > regular business meeting. There was a very favorable response to this > idea as well as a few suggestions that we hold an Ask Arlis session > instead. I have decided to go forward with the more informal discussion > session for the following reasons: proposals for AskArlis sessions need > a specific topic to be decided by May 31. By holding a > discussion session we can determine at that time what is most pressing > for us to discuss. > > There were some good ideas which people sent to me when they suggested an > AskArlis session and I would highly encourage them to make a formal > proposal to the program committee as they sounded like excellent topics. > > Ann Lally > Architecture Section Moderator > Just a reminder that it may not be as easy to schedule a 'discussion group' as it may be to get an Ask ARLIS on the program. I mention this only from experience on CPACs where this issue has been discussed. --Barbara Sykes-Austin, Avery Library