 |
 |
Hi Sam, Agreed that it's egregious and monopolizing behavior, but unfortunately paying it is your only option to get your holding on it. Had to do it here and at my last job. Sorry for the bad news. Best, Heather *Heather Slania* Director Decker Library [image: MICA Logo] <https://www.mica.edu/> 1300 W Mount Royal Ave. Baltimore, MD 21217 410.225.2311 . . Pronouns in use: she, her, hers Schedule a research consultation <https://calendly.com/libraryresearchconsultations> Schedule a meeting with me <https://calendly.com/hslania> [image: Instagram logo] <https://www.instagram.com/marylandinstitutecollegeofart/> [image: Snapchat logo] <https://www.snapchat.com/add/micastories> [image: Twitter logo] <http://www.twitter.com/mica> [image: Facebook logo] <http://www.facebook.com/mica.edu> [image: LinkedIn logo] <http://www.mica.edu/linkedin> [image: Behance logo] <http://portfolios.mica.edu/> [image: Medium logo] <https://medium.mica.edu/> [image: Youtube logo] <http://www.youtube.com/user/micamultimedia> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:40 PM Sam Duncan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Just sharing a concern of mine that goes way back having to do with > holdings listed on worlcat.org. Current OCLC policy does not allow a > library to have all its holdings listed on worldcat.org unless you are a > subscriber to WorldCat Discovery of Firstsearch (I believe that’s right). > For small-ish libraries like ours, a subscription is expensive, around > $2,500. I believe it’s a great disservice to our patrons and libraries. > Many specialized libraries like ours offer many unique holdings, and, > ironically, current OCLC policy allows a record to display with no holding > libraries listed (see attached screenshot). > > > > One OCLC representative wrote back when I addressed this concern, “I > understand you do not agree with the policy, but the Cataloging and > FirstSearch subscriptions are how we fund those services (along with > WorldCat.org). We try to keep them affordable for the majority, while > covering our costs, but it still does not work for everyone.” > > > > Here’s a great example. Keep in mind that if you’re associated with a > university library, you’ll probably see holdings. The problem is with cases > where a patron is searching at the local Starbucks down the street, for > example, or at home. > > > > https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1123217295 > > > > I totally understand that there is a price tag associated with making > worldcat.org available, but it’s an egregious levy for a library to pay > to have its holdings masked and totally antithetical to what OCLC is > supposed to be doing for libraries (IMHO). When I have suggested a more > equitable pricing structure, there has been no interest in investigating it. > > > > Thanks for your feedback. More than anything, I need a reality check from > my colleagues. > > > > Sam > > > > > > > > *Samuel Duncan | Head of the Research Library* > > Amon Carter Museum of American Art > 3501 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76107 > [log in to unmask] *|* 817.989.5042 > *cartermuseum.org <http://www.cartermuseum.org/>* > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining > ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/membership/join-arlisna Send > administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to > [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: > http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy > Dyki) at: [log in to unmask] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/membership/join-arlisna Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~