Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=10061, phase=CONNECT, target=127.0.0.1:2306). The server is probably not started. LISTSERV 16.5 - ARLIS-L Archives

Print

Print


The ARLIS/NA occasional paper "Fair Use in the Visual Arts: Lesson Plans 
for Librarians" is featured in the latest issue of Current Cites. 
Congratulations, and thanks again to the paper's editors! 

   

   From: currentcites List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf 
Of Roy Tennant
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 3:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CURRENTCITES] Current Cites, June 2018
  
                                Current Cites
  
                                 June 2018
  
                          Edited by [2]Roy Tennant
  
                  http://currentcites.org/2018/cc18.29.6.html
  
    Contributors: [3]Charles W. Bailey, Jr., [4]Peter Hirtle, [5]Leo 
Robert
    Klein, [6]Nancy Nyland
             _____________________________________________________
  
    Algenio, Emilie R. "[7]Making the Transition as the New Copyright
    Librarian"  [8]Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship
    2(1)(Spring, 2018)(https://doi.org/10.17161/jcel.v2i1.6579). - In 
1994,
    [9]Kenny Crews was appointed as the first copyright specialist in a
    library. Since then the number of libraries that employ copyright
    librarians has increased dramatically. But what is it that copyright
    librarians do, and how do they spend their time? Algenio addresses
    these questions by describing her own transition into the role. Her
    story, and the handy list of useful references and tools included in
    the appendices, will be of use to anyone who finds themselves in a
    similar position. - [10]PH
  
    Emery, Jill. "[11]How Green Is Our Valley?: Five-Year Study of 
Selected
    LIS Journals from Taylor & Francis for Green Deposit of Articles"
    [12]Insights  31(23)(2018)(http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.406). - 
Contrary
    to several reports in the scholarly literature, the battle for open
    access did not begin in 2001 with the Budapest Open Access Initiative.
    Rather, it began in the late 1980's when free journals began to be
    published on the Internet by librarians and faculty and authors began
    to ask publishers to retain their copyrights. So, here we are about 30
    years later and this study finds that self-archiving rates in
    institutional repositories for five library and information science
    journals published by Taylor&Francis ranged between 18% and 26%. This
    result is for a publisher who took steps to encourage self-archiving
    from 2011 through 2017. It falls within the general range for
    self-archiving activity in all disciplines. The author suggests 
several
    reasons for this level of self-archiving, including administrators
    undervaluing self-archiving activities and "imposter syndrome" (i.e.,
    librarians aren't perceived as real faculty). The article includes a
    link to open data from the study. The question this and similar 
studies
    raise is: should librarians be held to a higher standard than other
    scholarly authors? That depends on whether librarians truly have a
    higher level of belief and commitment to open access than other
    authors. If so, one would expect a higher level of self-archiving
    behavior. The battle for open access is a long one, measured in
    decades. It won't get any shorter if librarians, who are important 
open
    access supporters, don't walk the talk. - [13]CB
  
    Foster, Anita K. "[14]Determining Librarian Research Preferences: A
    Comparison Survey of Web-Scale Discovery Systems and Subject
    Databases"  [15]The Journal of Academic Librarianship  44(3)(May
    2018): 330 - 336.
    (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913331730438X).
    - Because library users expect a Google-like single search box,
    libraries have adopted discovery systems to meet the demand for
    centralized searching. Librarians are well aware of what less-than-
    optimal results can come from searching a large black box of
    information. The more a searcher has at least a general concept of 
what
    is in the box they are searching, the better the results. This survey
    of librarians confirms that they prefer subject-specific databases for
    their own searching, and the reasons why. The observation of "a lack 
of
    transparency around how information is included in the systems" and
    other comments provide an opening for the creators of web-based
    discovery systems. "Details about Google Scholar's index, content and
    functionality are not readily available," nor likely to be. In
    contrast, vendors have an opportunity to address some of the
    librarians' concerns articulated here. - [16]NN
  
    Gilliland, Anne T. "[17]The General Data Protection Regulation: What
    Does It Mean for Libraries Worldwide?"  [18]Association of Research
    Libraries Issue Briefs  (May
    
2018)(http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/IssueBrief_GDPR_May2018.pdf)
    . - The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) is providing guidance
    to libraries on the European Union's General Data Protection 
Regulation
    (GDPR), starting with the most basic facts, such as that it took 
effect
    on May 25, 2018. The GDPR applies to EU citizens and residents, 
whether
    resident in Europe, or living or visiting outside the EU. It grants
    users the choice to opt out of their personal data being collected,
    rather than allowing companies to assume that anyone using a site has
    opted in to having their data collected. The GDPR grants six specific
    rights that allow users to better control the collection and use of
    their personal data. Besides summarizing the GDPR, the issue brief
    points readers to [19]an explanation by the Library of Congress and 
the
    EU's [20]GDPR Information Portal. In the introduction, the ARL 
promises
    an update focusing on implementation of the GDPR. - [21]NN
  
    Griffin, Melanie, and Tomaro I  Taylor. "[22]Employing Analytics to
    Guide a Data-Driven Review of LibGuides"  [23]Journal of Web
    Librarianship  (19 June
    2018)(https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1487191). - Many 
librarians
    are involved with creating research guides, many in fact using
    LibGuides. So studies like this which use analytics to find out how 
our
    client base (i.e. students) actually use these guides can be extremely
    helpful. The goal, as the article makes clear, is "to create a more
    holistic picture of usability that will, in turn, guide more
    thoughtful, user-driven creation of library guides." - [24]LRK
  
    Haran, Judith A. "[25]The Nuremberg Trials Project at Harvard Law
    School: Making History Accessible to All"  [26]Journal of Contemporary
    Archival Studies (JCAS)  5(22 Jun
    2018)(https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol5/iss1/9/). - Back
    when I was a new archivist, one of the first collections on which I
    worked was the National Library of Medicine's collection of court
    documents from the medical prosecution at the Nuremburg Trials. In
    preparing its [27]finding aid, I learned that the documentary history
    of the trials was a mess, with no clear single record copy available
    anywhere. The librarians at the [28]Harvard Law School Library
    discovered the same thing when they began their ambitious project to
    digitize its massive ("between seven and twelve tons of paper")
    [29]collection of mimeographed trial documents. Haran notes the
    existence of other Nuremburg collections (though she overlooks the set
    of documents at NLM) and properly suggests that it may be time for
    repositories to cooperate in building a virtual common collection. The
    other big take-away for me from this fascinating digitization project
    is the massive commitment of human and financial resources it took.
    Documents are thoroughly analyzed at the item level, with an average 
of
    15 minutes spent on each document. It is terrific that Harvard has 
been
    able to muster the resources to undertake this level of analysis, but
    one wonders if it is a model that is transferable to other large
    collections. - [30]PH
  
    Marchant, Jo. "[31]Buried by the Ash of Vesuvius, These Scrolls Are
    Being Read for the First Time in Millennia"  [32]Smithsonian Magazine
    (July
    
2018)(https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/buried-ash-vesuvius-scroll
    s-are-being-read-new-xray-technique-180969358/). - I have [33]noted in
    the past general news articles about Brent Seales and his effort to 
use
    various forms of imaging to read nearly indecipherable texts. Others
    are just as fascinated by his efforts, as the recent story about him 
on
    [34]60 Minutes demonstrates. This longer article reviews Seales's
    earlier work and then focuses on his most recent investigation of a
    papyri fragment in the [35]Bodleian Library at the University of
    Oxford. It does a good job of highlighting the technical, financial,
    and professional challenges Seales faces. But how exciting it would be
    if we could finally make the invisible writing on charred fragments
    readable again! - [36]PH
  
    Matthews, Leni, . "[37]Terminology for Librarian Help on the Home
    Page"  [38]Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
    
13(2)(2018)(https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/
    article/view/29405/21868). - The process of choosing terms for web
    links leaves designers balancing between a label long enough to be
    comprehensible, and one brief enough to be grasped immediately in a
    user's first quick scan of a page. Librarians at the University of
    Texas at Arlington (UTA) discovered that user comprehension of link
    names is different than what page designers might have predicted. In
    spite of the usual advice for web designers to keep text on pages
    succinct, students preferred a longer link name, "Librarians by
    Academic Subject," to shorter ones such as "Ask Us." The students'
    preference for a longer link was borne out by a rise in page views
    after the name was changed. The UTA librarians confirmed the 
importance
    of user testing and the value of designing for users rather than what
    library staff might think users want. - [39]NN
  
    Watkins, Alexander, Bridget  Madden, and Alexandra  Provo, et.
    al.[40]Fair Use in the Visual Arts: Lesson Plans for Librarians
    (n.p.): Art Libraries Society of North America, 14 June
    
2018.(https://www.arlisna.org/publications/arlis-na-research-reports/14
    79-fair-use-lesson-plans-op17). - ARLIS/NA has produced an interesting
    addition to the field of copyright education. This volume provides
    overviews of twelve lesson plans developed by visual resource
    librarians and used to introduce undergraduate and graduate students 
to
    some of the important elements in copyright. Because the students are
    often artists themselves, much of the focus is on how students can use
    the work of others in their future professional lives. Each course
    includes a summary of what was taught, reflections on the experience,
    and a collection of teaching materials and presentation slides in
    appendices. Because it is often easier to illustrate key copyright
    concepts with visual examples, any librarian who is faced with the
    challenge of teaching a workshop on copyright may find material of 
use.
    - [41]PH
      __________________________________________________________________
  
    Current Cites - ISSN: 1060-2356 is published by Roy Tennant.
    (c) Copyright 2018 Roy Tennant [42]Creative Commons License

  




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/membership/join-arlisna Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~