 |
 |
At MoMA, we just made the decision to stop collecting and cataloguing printed auction catalogues, but that was *only *made possible/feasible by the local presence of Met/Watson and Frick Art Reference Library's comprehensive collections of auction catalogues, both historic and contemporary, which are readily available to us when we need them. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Peter Blank <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Greetings Susan, > For Stanford, I would add the following. > The Art & Architecture Library itself no longer subscribes to any auction > catalogs, but we receive and keep approximately 300 catalogs a year from > the Cantor Arts Center, Stanford's art museum, and via gifts. Also a > considerable number of dealer catalogs. These all receive copy cataloging > or original cataloging and are kept, but are housed in the Libraries' > offsite storage facility. > As others have noted, online content is very, very spotty, so we feel we > must keep physical copies for the time being. > Cheers all, > Peter Blank > > > On 6/17/2013 10:28 AM, Susan Ferrer-Vinent wrote: > > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > In answer to my question about *how many of the auction catalogues are > available on-line*, I received very helpful responses. **** > > Here is a summary of comments lifted from the messages, which came from > Constance & George Fearing Library, Santa Barbara Museum of Art – Crocker > Art Museum – Grolier Club of New York – Marquand Library of Art & > Archaeology, Princeton University – National Gallery of Canada – Seattle > Art Museum – University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries. Thank you all so > much !!!**** > > ** ** > > · Not as many as you’d think. The big houses post their > catalogues online but usually remove them once the sale is over and only > the results are available. **** > > ** ** > > · I do end up keeping all of my print versions because time and > time again, we find the online equivalent is sub-par: missing information, > no image, black and white image rather than color, etc. We don’t catalogue > our auction catalogues – unless they have substantial essays. We do keep > those un-catalogued ones (definitely in the thousands) in alpha order by > house name, then date on shelves – many, many shelves.**** > > ** ** > > · We absolutely HAD to get rid of all of our collection of > auction and dealer catalogs. Sometimes online access to Sotheby’s & > Christie’s has filled the bill. On occasion I have been told that they did > not have the image of the object, or that some other information was > lacking. Basically we are depending on the larger institutions to be the > keeper of these catalogs. I might add that our collection was incomplete > anyway.**** > > ** ** > > · The auction houses sometimes let you search for granular sales > transactions, which is wonderful (when it works) for values and > multiplicity of works by a given artist. I go to the paper catalogues as > historical artifacts documenting the sales events. Also for reproductions > that may not be online. I've never had much luck using the online sources > to replicate what I need/want from the paper catalogues. I grow fearful for > the historical record. How long will commercial firms pay for online > storage and maintenance of the thousands and thousands and ever-growing > thousands of high resolution images that I want from the auction > catalogues? Not to mention the text information. Is this access > sustainable? I don't see that they get much commercial benefit from > keeping the data up and the ephemeral interfaces operational forever, just > to satisfy art historians. I'd anticipate a cutback in availability at > some point. **** > > ** ** > > · Major auction houses have incomplete availability online. Very > uncomfortable with relying on online exclusively for provenance research. > Might move print catalogs offsite, but would not dispose of them.**** > > o No best-practices instituted by the various publishers**** > > o No 3rd party online archiving systems established**** > > o No assurance of the long-term accessibility**** > > ** ** > > · It seems that, in some cases, even for chronologically > proximate catalogs from the same house, it's a crap shoot--one catalog is > easy find, the next or previous impossible or very difficult. > > **** > > Once again, thank you,**** > > Susan**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ARLIS/NA List [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>] > *On Behalf Of *Susan Ferrer-Vinent > *Sent:* Friday, June 14, 2013 9:04 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* [ARLIS-L] Auction House catalogs online**** > > ** ** > > Good morning ARLIS librarians,**** > > **** > > I am hoping some of you will be willing to share your observations, > research, and/or opinions about auction house catalogs. We currently hold > catalogs from 36 different auction houses (from Aguttes through Wright). > Some of them have runs starting a long way back.**** > > **** > > Our chief curator asks: *How many of the auction catalogues are available > on-line?* **** > > I know that she underestimates the complexity of this question. I briefly > looked at Sotheby’s and was confused by my findings. I’m hoping librarians > with more knowledge and experience can suggest answers to her question.*** > * > > **** > > Thank you very much,**** > > Susan**** > > **** > > *Susan T. Ferrer-Vinent***** > > Librarian**** > > 720-913-0100**** > > [log in to unmask]**** > > **** > > Denver Art Museum**** > > 100 W. 14th Avenue Parkway**** > > Denver, CO 80204**** > > **** > > Visit www.denverartmuseum.org and subscribe to our e-newsletter<http://www.patronmail.com/pmailweb/PatronSetup?oid=238>. > The Denver Art Museum salutes the citizens of metro Denver for helping fund > arts, culture and science through their support of the Scientific and > Cultural Facilities District (SCFD). <http://www.scfd.org/>**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining > ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative > matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to > [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: > http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy > Dyki) at: [log in to unmask] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ **** > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining > ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative > matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to > [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: > http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy > Dyki) at: [log in to unmask] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > -- > Peter P. Blank > Head Librarian > Art & Architecture Library > 435 Lasuen Mall > 102 Cummings Art Building > Stanford University > Stanford, CA 94305 - 2018 > > [log in to unmask] > 650.725.1038 Voice > 650.725.0140 Fax > artlibrary.stanford.edu > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining > ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative > matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to > [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: > http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy > Dyki) at: [log in to unmask] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > -- ____________________________ Milan R. Hughston Chief of Library & Museum Archives The Museum of Modern Art 11 W. 53rd St. New York, NY 10019 212/708-9409 [log in to unmask] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~