Print

Print


Report from the ARLIS Representative to the MARC Advisory Committee:

NOTE: A fuller version of this report appears on Sherman Clarke's Art
Cataloging webpage, at http://artcataloging.net/ala/mw13/marbieok.html 

The MARC Advisory Committee (MAC) advises the Library of Congress
concerning changes to the MARC 21 formats. The MARC Advisory Committee
includes the American Library Association's (ALA) Machine-Readable
Bibliographic Information (MARBI) committee, US national libraries, the
Library and Archives Canada, the British Library, the National Library
of Australia, and the German National Library, the large bibliographic
networks such as OCLC, library associations such as the Music Library
Association, Special Libraries Association, and ARLIS, and library
system vendors. In the past, MAC has met two times a year at ALA under
the umbrella of MARBI, but in June, 2012, it was announced that MARBI
will be dissolved as of the conclusion of Annual 2013. MARBI will be
replaced by a Metadata Standards Committee (MSC) that will play a
leadership role in the creation and development of metadata standards
for bibliographic information. MAC will continue as LCs consultative
national committee on MARC, which LC is committed to maintaining.

The penultimate MARBI sessions at ALA Midwinter were rather thin gruel
in terms of issues specially pertinent to art documentation. The agenda
for the two meetings is available here:

http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/mw2013_age.html 

The three proposals defining new fields for audience characteristics,
creator/contributor group categorizations, and chronological categories
were most interesting, since they reflect a continuing trend away from
precoordinated indexing to a faceted approach. Each term in the new LC
genre/form thesaurus, LCGFT, is a single word or phrase that contains
only one concept; no qualifiers are allowed within a term, and there is
no subdivision. Hence the need for new fields to encode the information
that used to be included with LCSHs that functioned as de facto
genre/form terms. The Art and Architecture Thesaurus, used by many art
museums and art libraries, supports faceted indexing, but since our
systems still generally do not, most users of AAT construct
precoordinated headings. It will be interesting to see whether the LC
approach leads to library systems becoming more faceting-friendly.

And a warning: if you think you are seeing double when you start
encountering multiple 250 (Edition Statement) fields in new records,
don't call your eye doctor. The 250 field was made repeatable at the
request of the Music Library Association, to better accommodate edition
statements for music. The field can also be used for any resource
containing multiple edition statements. 

I also attended an update on progress on the Bibliographic Framework
Transition Initiative (BIBFRAME for short). A major focus of the
initiative is to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange
format in order to reap the benefits of newer technology while
preserving a robust data exchange that has supported resource sharing
and cataloging cost savings in recent decades. 

In 2012, early work by participants has produced a BIBFRAME Primer
Document, and some testing by early experimenters. In 2013, discussions
will be opened to a wider audience. New software will let the general
community experiment with what their MARC records look like using the
BIBFRAME models. They will also reach out to non-bibliographic
communities, such as archivists and object catalogers. 

There is now a website devoted to BIBFRAME:

http://bibframe.org/ 

It provides background information on the initiative, demos of what
MARC21 bib records look like as BIBFRAME resources, and a tools page
that offers:

1) Comparison service: Enter the bibliographic identifer (MARC BIB
field 001) or a Library of Congress Control Number (LCCN) and view a
before and after presentation of a MARC record from the Library of
Congress's database as BIBFRAME resources.

2) Transformation service: Submit your own MARC Bibliographic records
(as MARC/XML) and view them as BIBFRAME resources in Exhibit. The
resulting data are also available for download. 

I am particularly looking forward to viewing our own records as
MARC/XML, and I encourage you all to run your records through the tool.
Don't be surprised if some of your fields don't appear on the
transformations, since I understand that Bibframe hasn't yet
incorporated all MARC fields.

Liz O'Keefe
Morgan Library & Museum



Elizabeth O'Keefe
Director of Collection Information Systems
The Morgan Library & Museum
225 Madison Avenue
New York, NY  10016-3405
 
TEL: 212 590-0380
FAX: 212-768-5680
NET: [log in to unmask]

Visit CORSAIR, the Library’s comprehensive collections catalog, now
on
the web at
http://corsair.themorgan.org


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.arlisna.org Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~