Now there is the start of an interesting thread: If catalogers were
going to reinvent themselves and their systems to encompass all formats,
both analog and digital at the word, frame, or image level, how would
they do it? Or would they leave it to OCLC, JSTOR, ARTstor, and Google?
Eileen Fry
Indiana University
-----Original Message-----
From: Visual Resources Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Sherman Clarke
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VRA-L] [ARLIS-L] [VRA-L] Shared cataloging
Eileen,
Another "advantage" of the collective environment in OCLC/RLIN was the
impetus to use similar practices as well as sharing standards. OCLC or
RLIN records from the early years are much more quirky than recent
records. Of course, now we're trying to quirk 'em up with folksonomy
and point-of-view.
Virtual sharing via OAI or other methods, as outlined by Susan, seems
more promising than trying to build a single image record repository, a
la OCLC/RLIN. If we book catalog builders were starting from scratch,
we probably wouldn't rebuild OCLC. Hmm, I kept saying I wanted to see
UCAI; how fast time changes the landscape we work in.
Sherman Clarke
NYU Libraries
[log in to unmask]
__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
For information about joining ARLIS/NA see:
http://www.arlisna.org/join.html
Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask]
