I think that it's a little premature to suggest new
organizational names, but I wanted to point out that not all 'art
librarians' work in setting that deal with strictly visual culture.
Some of us also deal with information related to the built
environment, city planning, landscape architecture, construction
technology, etc. Maybe some of us are 'spatial culture'
information experts?. In any case I agree with statements that
have already been made that 'library' and 'information' are important
parts of our identity. Otherwise we'd simply want to join
organizations such as CAA, AAM, and the like.
One other thought related to the chapter issue---what if IFLA
started a campaign to try to bring in all the various ARLIS
organizations into IFLA's Art Section as regional IFLA chapters?
What does it mean to have a 'North American' organization in an
environment where much of our communication is online? Maybe
that's too big picture of a discussion point, but maybe our
relationship to IFLA should be examined as we consider our potential
membership base.
I'm also curious to know whether we have any arlis-l subscribers
in Mexico. If you are such a subscriber, this question is for
you: would a requirement to pay chapter dues as part of ARLIS/NA dues
encourage you to participate in chapter activities?
Best wishes,
Janine Henri
Eric,
"Visual Studies" is actually a
new named initiative in Duke's next 5-year strategic plan, which goes
into affect next week. I don't think this is necessarily an 80s/90s
thing. My department just changed its name from Art and Art History to
Art, Art History & Visual Studies to better reflect what we teach,
our part in Duke's interdisciplinary approach to all studies, and the
growing importance of visual culture studies at this university.
Visual studies offerings can be based in our department, Film and
Video, Women's Studies, Classics, Literature, Languages, the Law
School (art and the law), Information Studies, History, Genome
Science, etc.
I think the differentiation is between
the traditional history and study of works of art and architecture and
the history and study of images (those beyond art and architecture),
whether they be cultural images from the past or images from popular
culture today. We teach courses on art markets,
"destinations" (Disneyworld, Las Vegas), artists and trauma,
Roman spectacle, images of the nuclear age, caricature and comics, the
monastic life, etc. Not easily classifiable as traditional art or
architecture.
I always felt "visual resources
library" to be a vague term (whereas slide or photograph library
never was). Even "image" or "media" library seems
more descriptive of our collections now. Whenever I am
describing my title, facility, or profession, I always have to add
"slide, photograph, and digital image" as a subtext. What
does "Visual Resources Association" really say to anyone who
isn't in the field? I also don't see "art library" as
exclusive of image collections, just as the Art Libraries Society
already includes a VR division. Of course, back to my original point,
it's not all about "art" anymore.
John
I am all for closer relations between the
two organizations. Before any serious talk of mergers, however,
I think at least another couple joint conferences would be in order,
to ensure that the two cultures both can preserve everything they want
and complete their respective agendas within such a framework.
If it works well, then why not merge? It would be great
for people like me who are members of both organizations, but can only
go to one conference a year.
Regarding the term "Visual
Culture", I would have to take a dissenting view here. That
term was all the rage among art history departments in the late
'80s-early '90s. While they all considered changing their names
(and some did), it was never clear how this was reflected in the
discipline or curriculum. I think it is always good to have
titles whose meanings can be readily understood by the laity, and I
don't think this one can. As the bulk of us are still in museum
or academic art or architecture libraries and departments, I rather
like having the terms "art", "libraries" and
"visual resources" in our title. A professional
organization should work to improve society-at-large's image of
librarians and VR professionals-we shouldn't change are name to
convince people we are on the cutting edge-rather we should be on the
cutting edge to show people what our titles mean!
I do think this discussion is very
healthy!
Eric
Wolf
Director of the Library
New York School of Interior
Design
170 E. 70th Street
New York, NY 10021
212-472-1500 x216
[log in to unmask]
__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining
ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative
matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to
[log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html Questions may be addressed to
list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask]
--
John J.
Taormina
Director, Visual Resources Center
Dept. of Art, Art History & Visual Studies
Duke University
Box 90764
112 East Duke Building
Durham NC 27708-0764
Ph: 919-684-2501
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
http://www.duke.edu/web/art/
"The spice must flow."
-Frank Herbert,
Dune
__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining
ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org/join.html Send administrative
matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to
[log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html Questions may be addressed to
list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask]