By now you've probably heard that the Supreme Court has announced its decision upholding the constitutionality of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which had been challenged by ALA. Copied below are some news items on this. Although ARLIS/NA did not take an official position on this case, the Public Policy Committee has attempted to keep abreast of the situation, and will be reporting on the consequences of it and other recent censorship issues. In other news, the Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2003 was introduced as S. 1291 on June 19 by Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana). They are respectively the Chair and leading Democrat on the Finance Committee, to which the bill has been referred. I take that as a hopeful sign that this won't stay bottled up in committee for long. The bill would authorize the President to impose a temporary import restriction on antiquities and cultural property from Iraq. (See text and status info on Thomas, at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.01291: This bill is similar to the Iraq Cultural Heritage Protection Act, introduced in the House on May 7 as HR 2009. It now has 55 co-sponsors. The Senate bill seems to provide a less comprehensive import ban, suggesting that it is an attempt at a compromise for the stalled House bill. James Mitchell Co-Chair, ARLIS/NA Public Policy Committee Librarian, American Folk Art Museum Shirley K. Schlafer Library 45 West 53rd St. New York, NY 10019 [log in to unmask] (212) 265-1040 x110 News on CIPA and US v. ALA: Supreme Court says libraries can be forced to use Net filters GINA HOLLAND Associated Press WASHINGTON - A sharply divided Supreme Court ruled Monday that Congress can force the nation's public libraries to equip computers with anti-pornography filters. The blocking technology, intended to keep smut from children, does not violate the First Amendment even though it shuts off some legitimate, informational Web sites, the court held. The court said because libraries can disable the filters for any patrons who ask, the system is not too burdensome. The 5-4 ruling reinstates a law that told libraries to install filters or surrender federal money. It was victory for Congress, which has struggled to find ways to shield children from pornographic Internet sites. Congress has passed three laws since 1996 - the first was struck down by the Supreme Court and the second was blocked by the court from taking effect. The first two laws dealt with regulations on Web site operators. The latest approach, in the 2000 law, mandated that public libraries put blocking technology on computers as a condition for receiving federal money. Libraries have received about $1 billion since 1999 in technologies subsidies, including tax money and telecommunications industry fees. The government had argued that libraries don't have X-rated movies and magazines on their shelves and shouldn't have to offer access to pornography on their computers. Librarians and civil liberties groups had argued that filters are censorship and that they block valuable information. Filter operators must review millions of Web sites to decide which ones to block. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, writing for the majority, said the law does not turn librarians into censors. The latest law, the Children's Internet Protection Act, has been on hold. A three-judge federal panel in Pennsylvania ruled last year that it was unconstitutional because it caused libraries to violate the First Amendment. The filtering programs block too much nonpornographic material, the panel found. The Supreme Court disagreed. Justices had seemed skeptical in March during arguments in the case that it was onerous for library users to ask staff to disconnect filters when research is hampered. More than 14 million people use public library computers. Even without the law in place, some libraries use filtering software on their computers, with varying degrees of success in screening out objectionable material. Other libraries have varying policies that encourage parents to monitor their children's Internet use. The case is United States v. American Library Association, 02-361. [copied from http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_news/6151827.htm] ALAWON: American Library Association Washington Office Newsline Volume 12, Number 57 June 23, 2003 In This Issue: Supreme Court upholds CIPA, ALA Denounces Decision For Immediate Release June 23, 2003 ALA denounces Supreme Court ruling on Children's Internet Protection Act (Toronto) We are very disappointed in today's decision. Forcing Internet filters on all library computer users strikes at the heart of user choice in libraries and at the libraries' mission of providing the broadest range of materials to diverse users. Today's Supreme Court decision forces libraries to choose between federal funding for technology improvements and censorship. Millions of library users will lose. We are disappointed the Court did not understand the difference between adults and children using library resources. This flies in the face of library practice of age-appropriate materials and legal precedent that adults must have access to the full range of health, political and social information. The public library is the number one access point for online information for those who do not have Internet access at home or work. We believe they must have equal access to the Information Superhighway. In light of this decision and the continued failure of filters, the American Library Association again calls for full disclosure of what sites filtering companies are blocking, who is deciding what is filtered and what criteria are being used. Findings of fact clearly show that filtering companies are not following legal definitions of "harmful to minors" and "obscenity." Their practices must change. To assist local libraries in their decision process, the ALA will seek this information from filtering companies, then evaluate and share the information with the thousands of libraries now being forced to forego funds or choose faulty filters. The American Library Association also will explain how various products work, criteria to consider in selecting a products and how to best use a given product in a public setting. Library users must be able to see what sites are being blocked and, if needed, be able to request the filter be disabled with the least intrusion into their privacy and the least burden on library service. The ALA will do everything possible to support the governing bodies of these local institutions as they struggle with this very difficult decision. Contact: Larra Clark, Press Officer 416-585-3550/cell: 416-994- 6912 Contact: Frank DiFulvio, ALA Washington Office Press Officer 202- 628-8410/cell: 703-969-6701 ****** ALAWON (ISSN 1069-7799) is a free, irregular publication of the American Library Association Washington Office. All materials subject to copyright by the American Library Association may be reprinted or redistributed for noncommercial purposes with appropriate credits. __________________________________________________________________ Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] For information about joining ARLIS/NA see: http://www.arlisna.org//membership.html Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]