Dear ARLIS Folks, I've had quite a few requests to share the advice that was generously offered regarding MLS/MA-Art Hist., so I compiled it (text only, no names or email addys) into the following list. I guess I should not have requested off-list replies! :-) All the advice is certainly welcomed and appreciated. Alita Pierson Oberlin College ====== It's a great way to do it. MIT will pay for tuition for its employees (I got years of education while working as a cataloger there) and all sorts of academic institutions do it. You might have to plan where you want to be, what the benefits are, and what kind of job you're willing to take to make it happen. A lesser job can be good, since you're heart will probably be in studying. Don't forget that most good schools, if art history is your game, will give you free tuition and then tens of thousands of fellowship money, depending on how good you are and where you choose. I'd say aim high. That way you get through faster and can really concentrate on the graduate work. Best of luck with all this. I'm sure you'll get specific recommendations from the list, but don't trust just the librarians--talk to art historians, too. ====== Well, that's certainly one way to do it, although working full-time and going to school is quite stressful. It may take four or five years. Of course that is the best course financially, if you can find an entry-level librarian job in an institution which also has an M. A. program in Art History. I did both degrees at the same time and then went out in search of a job with no practical library experience. I suffered financially for the first several years but it was worth it in the end. I am glad I decided to finish my M.A. degree when I decided to enroll in the M.L. S. program. One other alternative to trying to get a free degree is to take a job in a town where there is a state university that has an M.A. program. The tuition there is often quite reasonable. I knew several colleagues who got their degrees at Hunter College, CUNY, for example. ====== Hi: That's what I thought I'd do when I got out of library school. Five years later, my experience has been I haven't had the time. Although I could probably have made more of a priority of it. I went straight into a job as head of a branch library though; if I weren't in charge of a branch it might be slightly less of a problem. I've found that this job and the one I had before it have both required that I have a very flexible schedule to be able to cover times when other staff are sick or on vacation. I don't think committing to being in class at certain times would really be feasible for me. I guess what I'm really trying to say is, there's a lot to be said for going to school full-time even for a second masters, and don't fool yourself into thinking that going to school while working full-time will be an easy solution, free or not. On the bright side, I haven't really felt that not having the second masters has been a real stumbling block in my career, at least so far. ====== I have my MLIS as of 1999, and am currently finishing an MA in art history. When I was considering an MA, I got the CAA catalog of Graduate Programs in Art (not sure of the exact title) and looked for programs that tended to offer full funding for their students. I was offered free tuition from two programs and ended up going with the program that also offered me a paid TA-ship. I worked full-time in libraries while in school for my MLIS and it was doable, but very stressful. I found the MA in Art History required even more work and time. I could not have worked full-time and done my MA in 2 years and stayed sane. But if you wanted to go more slowly, a school that did offer free tuition for employees would be a good option, and plenty of them do. I did feel quite poor living on a TA salary, and sort of resented the fact that I had to leave a good paying professional librarian position to be poor in school. Of course having the freedome of a student again was nice too and probably worth the poverty. ======= It's a great idea. I did exactly that, with several years intervening between the degrees. The M.A. in Art History took several years itself, so you must be highly motivated and patient. I got my MLS at UCLA in 1979 and worked there for three years. I moved to D.C. in 1982 and began work at George Washington University. I began graduate study in Art History there in 1987. It took me five more years to get the M.A., but several intervening events caused delays. People with a singular focus could go much faster. You will learn tremendous discipline and time management skills, not to mention the joy of the subjects themselves. Good luck. ======= The Met has a reimbursement program if you are a full time employee. I think they end up covering 80% of the cost in the end. You can go to Hunter, the Grad Center (CUNY), or Columbia. (and i think there's one scholarship that covers a completely free ride to Columbia) Hope this helps ======= I got my MLS in 2000 and plan to start my MA in art hist this fall. I would love to be employed by the academic institution that I plan to attend (CUNY) so that my benefits will allow me to study for "free." It's a great plan providing that everything falls into place. Some additional unsolicited advice--if possible I would consider doing the MA in art history first and then doing the MLS and working at that academic institution. Academic libraries typically do hire their MLS students and the MLS curriculum is less demanding then the MA and will better enable you to work while you study. __________________________________________________________________ Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] Administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]