Maybe some cataloger out there can shed some light on this. My original
question is at the bottom with LC id's attached.
Susan Lentz
University of Calif.
Santa Barbara CA 93106
[log in to unmask]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:07:48 -0400
From: Sherman Clarke <[log in to unmask]>
To: Susan Lentz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Installations (Art)
Susan,
I've never noticed this. I can imagine the heading following the
artist's nationality when the piece is inherently movable but following
the place of installation if it's either in nature or reallllly big. If
you have a few examples, I'd like to see them. You are welcome to use
the artnaco list (or arlis-l of course) for some other opinions.
Sherman
----- Original Message -----
From: Susan Lentz <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:18 pm
Subject: Installations (Art)
> It appears that LC continues to be a little random in the
> application of
> the geographical subdivision to single artist installations. Most are
> subdivided by the place representing the artist's nationality (as
> most art
> forms are). But a continuing segment are subdivided by the place
> wherethe intallation was installed. Am I missing some reason why
> some would be
> handled one way and some the other? I thought I would run this by you
> before I hassled LC.
Installation by location:
dclc0035025b
dclc00361358b
dclc2001338081b
dclc99196982b
dclc98221715b (traveling show)
Installation by artist's nationality:
dclc9989887b
dclc2001326574b
dclc00691786b
dclc0036269b (traveling show)
dclc00388220b
__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
Administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]
