----------------------------Original message---------------------------- This is not accurate! Artists often sell or give their works to museums and collectors, while retaining the copyright for themselves. Ownership and copyright are not ipso facto synonymous. Maryly Snow Librarian, and Artist Michael Moore wrote: > ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > > Whoever owns the original works of art owns copyright to any reproductions > of those works. If the photographer has written permission from the > original or current owners of the works, than he/she may reproduce them, > based on the original agreement. Otherwise, the photographer can not > reproduce any or all of the works, whether in whole or part. Once an > artist sells or reliquinshes his work he/she loses all ights to the work, > unless a written agreement at time of the sale or exchange takse place. > > Sincerely > Michael J. Moore > Hagerty Library > Drexel University > __________________________________________________________________ Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] Administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc) to [log in to unmask] ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance: http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html Questions may be addressed to list owner at: [log in to unmask]