LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  December 1996

ARLIS-L December 1996

Subject:

NINCH REPORT

From:

Judy Dyki <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ART LIBRARIES SOCIETY DISCUSSION LIST <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Dec 1996 21:08:54 EST

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (338 lines)

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Forwarded from the NINCH  list.

Judy

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

From:   David Green, INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
TO:     Multiple recipients of list, INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
DATE:   12/4/96 10:50 PM

RE:     MEMBERS REPORT #9

===================================

FROM THE DIRECTORS DESK - 9

 C O N T E N T S

DIGITAL LIBRARIES

1. National Digital Library Program
2. National Digital Library Federation
3. Digital Library Initiative
4. Electronic Libraries Programme (eLib)
5. G-7: Bibliotheca Universalis
6. Resources

In May, I had the first of two meetings with Deanna Marcum, President
of the Commission on Preservation and Access and the Council on
Library Services. The themes of our meeting were two of the most
compelling aspects of the work of these two organizations--that of the
preservation and archiving of *digital* resources and of digital
libraries.

In many ways the task of creating "digital libraries" is at the heart of
what NINCH's mission. Rather than a digital library, we are creating
interconnected, distributed "libraries" of material in many forms.
Whether we call these organized, indexed and catalogued collections of
resources libraries, databases or something else, our goal is that they
will be seamlessly interconnected and searchable.

In the meantime, there are a number of large-scale digital library
projects and consortia that have been established within the past year
or so and I thought I would take this opportunity to review what these
projects are, the stage of their development and indicate resources for
further information.

1. National Digital Library Program (NDLP)

Fist is the ambitious and productive five-year program announced by
the Library of Congress in 1994: the NDLP. Its goal is to digitize a core
of
selected primary materials from the Library's immense collections that
it would make accessible to a broad constituency of users--from
professionals and scholarly researchers to college students and
schoolchildren. The NDLP is a complement to other services that make
Library material available digitally to the public--THOMAS, providing
access to Congressional and legislative material, and CORE, a prototype
for accepting materials in digital form for copyright registration and
deposit.

This is a private-public program: $15 million requested from Congress
with $45 million to be raised from the private sector.

The NDLP <lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/ammemhome.html> is built on
the earlier pilot program, "American Memory" (1989-1994) in which
several collections of U.S. cultural material were digitized, with an
emphasis on a wide variety of formats (texts, prints, daguerreotypes,
motion pictures, recorded sound archives) in order to raise specific
format challenges. Towards the close of the project, the World Wide
Web erupted onto the scene and three collections of photographs were
made available to the public using this new medium. The title,
"American Memory" remains for the Web-accessible collections being
digitized under its successor program, the NDLP. Currently, 25
collections are available on the Web.

The groups of materials that have been digitized by the Library of
Congress fall into three classes: existing, integral archive collections;
collections brought together in a particular format (e.g. daguerreotypes);
and thematic anthologies specially created by scholars for digitizing
from many other collections in the Library.

Rather than remain an inert body of digital cultural resources,
American Memory has created a "Learning Page" that will help K-12
students and teachers find and use material related to the categories of
people, place, event, date and topic.

NDLP was designed to be a dynamic program: what is learned in the
process is incorporated in further directing the project. Among the
practical areas constantly under review are matters such as how to
tackle materials that are particularly difficult to digitize,
relationships
with and supervision of outside contractors and workflow planning.
The library is working particularly keenly on establishing a new
naming scheme for materials (working towards replacing the current
Uniform Resource Locator scheme, indicating where material is
located, with a more trustworthy Uniform Resource Name system) and
of developing increasingly sophisticated and specific search and
retrieval techniques.

With regard to the latter, currently "American Memory" resources that
have individual item-level bibliographic entries can be searched across
collections using the INQUERY search engine. However, records are
being encoded using SGML and the EAD DTD to prepare for more
sophisticated searches across finding aids as well.

The Library of Congress is also working to develop different interfaces
for different users, working with teachers to understand the kinds of
questions students actually ask of such material, and looking to
integrate thesauri into interfaces to make searches richer and more
rewarding.

NDLP staff emphasize the importance of cooperating with others in
learning how best to build a distributed architecture for digital
libraries,
with the belief that when the project concludes there will be no need
for a separate "American Memory" program: it should be part of an
increasingly integrated landscape of networked cultural resources.

In July, the Library announced its first ever competition. With a $2
million grant from Ameritech, the Library will make awards of
between $50,000 and $75,000 for twelve-to-eighteen month digital
projects involving primary materials "significant for education and
research in United States history and culture for the period 1850-1920."
These materials will augment the American Memory project both in
terms of material and in terms of filling out the concept of the NDLP as
a distributed collection of converted library materials and digital
originals to which many American institutions will contribute.
Deanna Marcum heads the panel evaluating the proposals. Results will
be announced in March 1997.


2. National Digital Library Federation (NDLF)

One of the consortia that the Library of Congress works with is the
National Digital Library Federation (lcweb.loc.gov/loc/ndlf).

Established in May 1995, the NDLF comprises 15
(lcweb.loc.gov/loc/ndlf/agree.html) of the largest research libraries
committed to establishing a governance structure and an infrastructure
for incorporating local digital library initiatives into a larger whole.
NDLF came about as an answer to the question whether individual
institutions could afford the investment and organizational
transformations necessary to meet the demands of a digital age.
Engaging major research libraries collectively in the process of
developing digital products and providing digital services will
strengthen their position as participants in the larger information
infrastructure. Even simply within the scholarly community, research
libraries will need to work with academic institutions, publishers,
scholarly organizations and others. However, the Federation can be
instrumental in leading the way in planning the necessary
infrastructure.

The Federation comprises a policy board and a planning task force,
which issued its report in June 1996. The policy board is currently
following the report's recommendations and is expecting to appoint a
program officer by April 1997.

The report emphasized the need to develop common standards,
protocols and practices between research libraries before they can
meaningfully extend access to their resources. It identified three key
areas for work: discovery and retrieval; intellectual property rights and
economic models; and the archiving of digital information.

For discovery and retrieval, the report proposes a three-part course:
building pilot gateways on its web site to digital collections; adding
Internet searching tools; and building cross-collection searching ability
by agreeing to the use of a minimal core of metadata elements--such as
the Dublin Core.

On intellectual property rights, the report recommends the adoption of
a rights policy by the Federation and individual institutions, which
would maximize scholarly access to digital objects, minimize inter-
institutional charges for such access, preserve fair-use practices and
encourage participation in groups creating rights-management
technologies. The Report calls for recognition of the connection
between intellectual property rights and the economics of creating,
supporting and preserving digital material.

On archiving digital material, the report recommended three courses
of action: i) to develop legal foundations for digital archiving (to
determine who has the rights and responsibilities to digitally archive
material) and to have the Federation help define the "fail-safe"
mechanism (enabling a certified archive to "exercise an aggressive
rescue function" to save culturally significant digital information) as
discussed in "Preserving Digital Information" (the report of the Task
Force on Archiving of Digital Information, created by the Commission
on Preservation and Access and the Research Libraries Group); ii) to
include as part of core metadata, information on the level of
committment to digital archiving by an institution providing given
digital information; and iii) by assisting institutions migrate digital
materials through developing guidelines and best practices.

As part of its task, the National Digital Library Federation recognizes
the need to sponsor testbed digital projects, both to seriously build
digital collections and to engage libraries in collaborative activity.
Some
multi-institutional projects between Federation members are already
in place, including the "Making of America Project"
(http://library.cit.cornell.edu/MOA/moa-mission.html), currently
being undertaken by Cornell and Michigan.


3. Digital Library Initiative

The major multi-institutional research project in this area is the Digital
Library Initiative (DLI), which comprises six comparatively
independent testbed projects undertaken by six research libraries:
Carnegie Mellon; Stanford; University of California, Berkeley;
University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Illinois, Urbana-
Champaign; and the University of Michigan.

DLI is a four-year, $24 million project jointly funded by the National
Science Foundation (NSF), the Advanced Research Projects Agency
(ARPA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) for the period September 1994 through August 1998. The
Initiative's focus is "to dramatically advance the means to collect,
store,
and organize information in digital forms, and make it available for
searching, retrieval, and processing via communication networks."
The emphasis here is on deep technical research, rather than on the
social, organizational and infrastructure issues facing the NDLF.
Throughout the projects there is also is a concern with scalability: how
particular research results can be applied on a massive scale.

The research challenge, as seen by the three sponsors, was not so much
that of how to connect everything and everyone in a network, but how
to achieve "an economically feasible capability to digitize massive
corpora of extant and new information from heterogeneous and
distributed sources; then store, search, process and retrieve information
from them in a user friendly way."

The particular configuration of the sponsors (NSF, ARPA and NASA)
points to the need in such a project for a combination of basic research,
advanced development and applications ability and experience with
the working relationships between industry and academic institutions.

A summary of the projects is as follows:

Carnegie Mellon University
  Project: Full-content search and retrieval of video
  http://fuzine.mt.cs.cmu.edu/im/informedia.html

 Stanford University
 Project: Interoperation mechanisms among heterogeneous services
 http://Walrus.Stanford.edu/diglib/

  University of California at Berkeley
  Project: Work-centered digital information services
  http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/

 University of California at Santa Barbara
 Project: Spatially-referenced map information
  http://alexandria.sdc.ucsb.edu/

  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  Project: Federating repositories of scientific literature
  http://www.grainger.uiuc.edu/dli

 University of Michigan
 Project: Intelligent agents for information location
http://http2.sils.umich.edu/UMDL/HomePage.html


For a more thorough account of the DLI, see the special issue of
"Computer" magazine for May 1996, available at
www.computer.org/pubs/computer/dli. The July/August issue of D-
Lib Magazine was partly dedicated to the half-way point assessment of
the DLI: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july96/07contents.html.


4. Electronic Libraries Programme

Less grandiose, but perhaps more all-embracing, than the DLI is the
British "Electronic Libraries Programme", or eLIB. This comparatively
open, three-year, 15 million initiative is run by the UK's Higher
Education Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Initially 30
various eLIB projects were approved in 1995; currently some 60 projects
are being funded under the following categories: Access to Network
Resources; Digitization; Electronic Document Delivery; Electronic
Journals; Electronic Short Loan; Images; On Demand Publishing; Pre-
Prints; Quality Assurance; Supporting Studies; Training and
Awareness. Information on particular projects can be found at
www.ukoln.ac.uk/elib/projects.html.

Projects of particular interest to the cultural community include
ADAM, an Art, Design, Architecture and Media information gateway
(adam.ac.uk/ADAM/ADAMSummary.html); SOSIG, a Social Science
Information Gateway (sosig.ac.uk/); the Internet Library of Early
Journals (www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/ilej/); DIAD, Digitization in Art and
Design--a CD-ROM journal project (www.lond-
inst.ac.uk/projects/diad/); and PATRON, Performing Arts Teaching
Resources On-line
(www.surrey.ac.uk/Library/research/PATRON.html)

The bi-monthly publication, ARIADNE, an eLIB project itself, is
designed to keep everyone updated on UK digital library
developments: www.ukoln.ac.uk/ariadne/about/.

5. G-7 Electronic Libraries

Mention should be made here of the G-7 Program on the Global
Information Society. The G-7 nations (the U.S., Canada, Britain, France,
Germany, Italy and Japan) have initiated eleven pilot projects
(www.ispo.cec.be/g7/projidx.html) in areas ranging from maritime
information systems to global healthcare applications to show how
international cooperation will be essential enabling true global
information access. For the cultural community, the two projects of
interest are those on Electronic Museums and Galleries, and Electronic
Libraries.

The Electronic Libraries project is to build a prototype global library:
Bibliotheca Universalis (www.ispo.cec.be/g7/projects/g7pr4.html). The
Library of Congress is the representative.


6. Resources

*IFLA: Digital Libraries: Resources & Projects: www.nlc-
bnc.ca/ifla/II/diglib.htm
*Library of Congress: Digital Library Resources and Projects:
lcweb.loc.gov/loc/ndlf/digital.html
*D-Lib Magazine--The Magazine of Digital Library Research:
www.dlib.org

--


   David Green
   Executive Director
   National Initiative for a Networked
     Cultural Heritage (NINCH)
   21 Dupont Circle, N.W.
   Washington, DC   20036
     (202) 296-5346
     Internet: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager