LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  November 1996

ARLIS-L November 1996

Subject:

FWD>URGENT- DFC ACTION ALER

From:

Hinda Sklar <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ART LIBRARIES SOCIETY DISCUSSION LIST <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 20 Nov 1996 16:29:22 EST

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (192 lines)

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Mail*Link(r) SMTP               FWD>URGENT: DFC ACTION ALERT

ALERT!!  YOUR SUPPORT IS NEEDED AT THIS CRITICAL TIME!

Below is information from the Digital Future Coalition concerning the 22
November 1996 deadline to submit remarks to the Patents and Trademarks
organization concerning the draft World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO) proposals.

Copies of the full text of the proposed treaties are available electronically
through the World Intellectual Property Organization <http://www.wipo.org>.
Additional information is also available through the DFC web site at:
<http://www.dfc.org/dfc/>.

Letters can be submitted electronically to: Keith Kupferschmid of the Patents
and Trademarks Office at [log in to unmask] Please take a few minutes to
draft a letter supporting the DFC position on these proposals. These proposals
as they stand could create laws which will affect our ability to carry out the
research and educational agendas of our institutions.  Your support is
needed-- write today!

ARLIS/NA, Public Policy Committee
Katherine Poole, Co-Chair
        [log in to unmask]
Hinda Sklar, Co-Chair
        [log in to unmask]

--------------------------------------
Date: 11/15/96 11:26 AM
From: Digital Future  Coalition
Attached is an outline and action alert for a submission to the PTO for
remarks regarding the draft WIPO proposals.  Please the the DFC site for
additional information (http://www.dfc.org/dfc/)  If you have any
questions, please call Ephraim Cohen at (202) 628-6048 or Peter Jaszi
at (202) 274-4216.  Thank you.

Outline:
1) Statement of organization's mission
2) Statement of pending proposals most relevant
3) Statement of concern regarding impact of mission and activities
(e.g., concerns about effect on distance education, availablity of useful
consuemr eletronic technologies, effects increased usage fees,
privace)
4) Endorsement of WIPO consensus building process and encourage
that consensus be struck
5) Conclusion -- If there is no consensus, the United States should
neither endorse proposals which could adversely affect U.S. law and
should urge WIPO to defer action on items with no consensus.

Action Alert:
DFC ACTIVITIES HELP OPEN INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT TREATY
PROPOSALS TO RARE ROUND OF PUBLIC COMMENTS; FILE NOW!!!
BROAD REDISTRIBUTION OF THIS NOTICE, AND SUBMISSION OF
COMMENTS, STRONGLY ENCOURAGED; COPYRIGHT EXPERTISE NOT
REQUIRED.

ALERT!!!        All parties interested in this issue are strongly urged to share
this bulletin widely and to take advantage of the opportunity announced
in the Federal Register of October 17 (pg. 54159) to comment on
pending international treaty proposals now supported by the Executive
Branch.  If adopted as written this coming December, the three
proposed treaties could severely limit Congress' ability to preserve Fair
Use, facilitate browsing on the Internet, foster the use of computers in
"distance education," and encourage basic scientific and academic
research.

Please read on for more information, where to obtain easily understood
analyses of the pending proposals and their text, and how to let the
Executive Branch know before Nov. 22 that librarians and educators
don't want Congress' flexibility to keep American copyright law fairly
balanced destroyed or diminished by the premature adoption of
international treaties which remain highly controversial in both the public
and private sectors here at home.

ACTION: ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 22, 1996 write AND e-mail the
United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) your (or your
institution's) support for building a domestic consensus on how best to
balance copyright law in the digital age and your opposition to
prematurely changing international law in any way that risks reducing
Congress' flexibility to fully debate and adopt policy that works for
business and the public in this complicated area of the law.

The Digital Future Coalition and many others in industry, academia and
the private sector have worked intensively for the past year to
encourage the Administration to take a fresh look at what the United
States' official position should be in international copyright treaty
negotiations to convene in Geneva early this December. The recent
Federal Register request for comments signals the beginning of that
process.  With negotiations set to begin on December 2, now is the time
for businesses, librarians, educators, and consumers to make clear
their commitment to Fair Use, balanced copyright law and full
Congressional latitude to build consensus on these critical copyright and
related issues.   Details on how to find more information and to file your
comments follows...

Tell the PTO that adoption of the pending treaty proposals presents
precisely that kind of risk, and that they should be amended in a broadly
supported manner to eliminate that risk.  If such amendments are not
possible, the three treaty proposals should be thoroughly discussed in
Geneva this December, but action on their sections dealing with digital
technology should be deferred until Congress (and the world) can
better understand and define the proposals' potential impact on
business, education and the public at large.

DETAILS:        COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT TREATIES MUST BE
RECEIVED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 22, 1996. For additional
analysis and background information, please access the Digital Future
Coalition's page on the World Wide Web at <http://www.dfc.org/dfc/> or
202-628-6048.  Copies of the full text of the proposed treaties are
available electronically through the World Intellectual Property
Organization <http://www.wipo.org>.

Please submit all comments both by mail and electronically, if possible.
Comments may be mailed to: Ms. Carmen Guzman Lowrey, Associate
Commissioner for Governmental and International Affairs, Commissioner
of Patents and Trademarks, Box 4, Patent and Trademark Office,
Washington, D.C. 20231. Electronic submissions should be sent to Mr.
Keith Kupferschmid at [log in to unmask]

For those in or near Washington, a public briefing on the proposed
treaties will be held on November 12, 1996, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. in
Marriott's Crystal Forum, a part of the Crystal City Marriott Hotel, 1999
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.  Mr. Jukka Liedes of Finland,
Chairman of WIPO's Committee of Experts, will discuss the texts and
answer questions. It is not necessary to register for the public briefing.
A transcript of the briefing will be made available at the Patent and
Trademark Office's Web site at <http://www.uspto.gov>.

BACKGROUND: The Digital Future Coalition has taken a lead role in
educating policy makers in Congress and the Executive Branch about
the sweeping implications of recent proposals to update copyright law
for the digital age.  In the just-concluded 104th Congress, those efforts
were rewarded with Congress' recognition that it would have been
premature to pass the "National Information Infrastructure Copyright
Protection Act" (the "NII Legislation") [S. 1284/H.R. 2441] in its original
form and that action on any such bill should be deferred until next year.

Members of the DFC also have been concerned from the outset of the
Congressional debate in September of 1995, however, that proposals
by the U.S. and other nations to make substantial changes in
international law similar to those proposed in the NII Legislation could
restrict the scope of Congressional consideration next year and force
the adoption of new laws not previously debated.  If adopted, the DFC
believes, such treaties could seriously undermine Congress' ability to
preserve Fair Use, hinder efforts to use digital technology for library
preservation efforts, cripple "distance education" (also called
"asynchronous learning"), and bar the manufacture of devices that
facilitate these critical activities.

Other new international proposals, if adopted, would require Congress
to enact an entirely new legal regime -- separate from and in addition to
copyright protection -- for databases now outside the scope of
copyright, such as compiled raw scientific data and telephone "White
Pages."  Moreover, under this database proposal never scrutinized by
Congress, government information and other public domain material
could be placed practically or financially off limits to entrepreneurs,
researchers, scholars, students and the public at large.

The present Administration has been a source and strong proponent not
only of the NII Legislation (which it authored), but of the three pending
international treaty proposals before the World Intellectual Property
Organization ("WIPO"), an arm of the United Nations .  WIPO's more than
100 member nations will meet in Geneva from December 2 through 20,
1996 in a formal Diplomatic Conference to determine whether the
portions of these copyright treaties dealing with digital technology (and
the proposed database agreement) are ripe for international adoption
and, if so, in what form.  The Patent and Trademark Office's recent
request for comments in the Federal Register, however, confirms that
the Administration is comprehensively reexamining whether and how
United States negotiators should proceed.


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by gsd.harvard.edu with SMTP;15 Nov 1996 11:23:28 -0500
Received: from ns1.alawash.org by  gsd.harvard.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
        id AA20013; Fri, 15 Nov 96 11:18:08 EST
Received: from listserv.alawash.org (listserv.alawash.org [199.75.52.222]) by
ns1.alawash.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA03065; Fri, 15 Nov 1996
16:22:00 GMT
Received: from ALA_DC_COMM/SpoolDir by listserv.alawash.org (Mercury 1.21);
    15 Nov 96 11:23:38 EST
Received: from SpoolDir by ALA_DC_COMM (Mercury 1.21); 15 Nov 96 11:23:21 EST
From: Digital Future  Coalition <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Digital Future Coalition Discussion List" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: URGENT: DFC ACTION ALERT
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:22:29 -0500
Sender: [log in to unmask]
X-Listname: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1 (via Mercury MTS v1.21)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager