LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  October 1996

ARLIS-L October 1996

Subject:

NINCH newsletter

From:

Judy Dyki <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ART LIBRARIES SOCIETY DISCUSSION LIST <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Oct 1996 12:23:54 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (395 lines)

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Forwarded from NINCH list.  The newsletter can also be found on the NINCH
Web site (http://www-ninch.cni.org/News/Newsletter3.html).


Judy

##############################################

NINCH
Networked Cultural Heritage Newsletter
No. 3
October 23, 1996
www-ninch.cni.org/news/news.html

====================================================================
A news and information digest for those working to preserve and
provide access to cultural heritage resources through networked digital
technology.
====================================================================

This newsletter is published through the NINCH-Announce listserv of the
National Initiative for a Networked Cultural Heritage. You are welcome to
distribute it freely, with due acknowledgments. It is also available in a
hyperlinked version on the NINCH web site.


         ACCESS: SCHOOLS, LIBRARIES....AND THE ARTS?
         -------------------------------------------

                         Summary

1. THE FCC AND UNIVERSAL SERVICE
The Telecommunications Act's Universal Service provision mandates
discounted rates for telecommunications services to schools and
libraries. What services will be included and how discounts will be
implemented will be ruled on by the Federal Communications
Commission next May. Recommendations, based on public
comments, will be made to the FCC by a Joint Board on November
7, after which further comments will be elicited. Many support a
two-tiered E-Rate proposal, including free basic telecommunications
services, but industry is generally opposed to this suggestion.


2. INFORMATION RENAISSANCE: A GRASSROOTS APPROACH
One nonprofit organization organized an on-line seminar to
educate teachers and librarians about the Universal Service
provision to encourage broader participation in the FCC's process of
soliciting comments. Future seminars are planned.


3. NET DAY: A SUPPLEMENTAL LEVERAGED APPROACH
If industry is broadly opposed to the free provision of
telecommunications services to schools and libraries, many
businesses have contributed equipment and the time of employees
to NetDay, a national attempt to wire all the schools in the country
for Internet access.

4. OPEN STUDIO: A SMALL BEGINNING FOR ARTS ACCESS
The National Endowment for the Arts, in collaboration with the
Benton Foundation, has announced a $1 million annual program
to provide access sites and training to artists and arts groups in
every state of the nation.

                 -----------------------------


                 THE FCC AND UNIVERSAL SERVICE

By next May, the FCC will rule on how the country will assist
schools and public libraries in paying for telecommunications
services.

The Snowe-Rockefeller-Kerrey amendment to the new
Telecommunications Act mandated discounted rates for K-12
schools, public libraries and rural health care providers but did not
spell out the details.

The FCC has called for comments twice this year on which services
should be included under discounted rates and how the program
would be implemented. A Federal-State Joint Board has been
charged to make recommendations to the FCC, based on these
comments, by November 7. The eight-person board, organized to
design the implementation of the Universal Service policies in the
new Telecommunications Act comprises three FCC officials, four
state utility commissioners and Missouri's public counsel as
consumer representative.


THE E-RATE

One of the most popular, yet contentious, proposals before the
Board is for an "E" (for Education) rate. Rep. Edward Markey (D-
MA) first proposed this as a simple free rate for schools and public
libraries, in April 1996, but it has now been considerably elaborated.

The proposal has two tiers: for basic and advanced
telecommunications services. The basic package would include
telephone service and a T1 Internet connection. Any school district
in this tier would create a technology plan to incorporate basic
telephone and Internet services into the curriculum.  The district
would then solicit bids from local telecommunications providers to
fulfill the needs outlined in the plan. The winning bid would be the
one combining the best functionality and price. Monies from the
Universal Service Fund (USF) would support the cost of
installation of the telephone wire and the monthly charges for the
services.

The second tier addresses more advanced and special services,
allowing schools and libraries to be eligible for discounts reflecting
"the best available commercial rate."  Videoconferencing, for
example, would be an advanced service that a school or library
could receive at the lowest price a provider charges its biggest
customers. Although there would be no support from the USF in
this tier, those schools and libraries in high-cost and low-income
areas would receive deeper discounts for advanced services that
would be paid for from the Fund.

Full details of the E-rate are available at
www.ntia.doc.gov/new.html.

President Clinton strongly supports this proposal, declaring it a "big
deal," (New York Times, Oct 21, D5), as does FCC chairman, Reed
Hundt and the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration. The NTIA's comments submitted to the FCC October
10, outlining a framework for implementing the E-Rate, are available
at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fccfilings/cc96_45furthercom.htm

This summer, Vice President Gore and Education Secretary Riley
went further in calling for a free package of services to include e-
mail, Internet access and video conferencing.


FCC COMMENTS: WHAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED?

According to FARNET, comments received by the FCC on which
services should be eligible for discounts ranged from the U.S.
Telephone Association's refusal to countenance anything other
than current "Plain Old Telephone Service" to the American
Library Association's call for "any telecommunications service
offered commercially under tariff or through contract."

Regarding the issue of whether inside wiring of K-12 schools should
be included, comments again were somewhat predictable. Industry
was generally opposed, while the American Library Association felt
that everything should be considered, including "ancillary
modifications to permit installation."  However, most providers of
inside wiring will not be telecommunications providers and would
thus not be eligible for reimbursement from the Universal Service
Fund. The chances of this provision's inclusion in the Board's
recommendations seem slim.

Another contentious issue was the resale prohibition of the Act,
which could prevent school districts from sharing networks or
extending access to public libraries and other community groups.

Finally, there are several questions about mechanisms for
distributing discounts, ways of determining discounts and whether
deeper discounts should be granted economically disadvantaged
schools.

The Benton Foundation has compiled useful "Summaries of
Comments Filed in Universal Service Proceedings on Universal
Service," available at http://www.benton.org/cgi-
bin/lite/Summaries/summaries.html. The complete comments
can be downloaded from the FCC web site:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/univs
erv_comm.html


COST

The Administration estimates that the cost of providing
telecommunications access to schools and libraries would be $2.5
billion spread over five years. Currently, the discounts would be
paid for by telephone companies who would pass the costs on to
their customers: $6 a year for the average phone bill, according to
the Consumer Federation of America (New York Times, Oct. 21, D
5)

Congressman Major Owens (D-NY), in testimony before the Joint
Board, pointed out that this was less than the price of one aircraft
carrier and was probably not out-of-line with the country's
investment in the development of the intercontinental railroad.
These estimates include the current cost of T1 lines and other
services that could dramatically drop with the increased demand of
110,000 schools and 16,000 libraries. The Benton Foundation
reminds us that these estimates are dwarfed by the current
Universal Service Fund and access fee support for local phone
systems, estimated at between $5 and $18 billion a year.

Nicholas von Hoffman (The Architectural Digest, Oct. 96, p. 130)
considers this sum to be equivalent to that spent by Andrew
Carnegie during the great library building period. However, apart
from capital costs, there are the costs of sustainability and of user
support. According to a senior vice president of the New York
Public Library's Research Libraries, "our equipment is on a three-
year, $6,000 replacement cycle.  If people are using
things like the World Wide Web, we need one staff member out on
the floor for every 20 workstations in use...  Right now we have 250
workstations for the public, so one staff member for every 20
workstations becomes a major investment." (Edupage, Sept. 17)


PREDICTIONS

FARNET considers it likely that the Joint Board will recommend
conservative action to the FCC, even though the education and
library community are pressing for more expansive movement.
One consideration is that the Act requires discounts only from
"telecommunications providers," common carrier providers, not
Internet Service Providers or cable companies, for example, and
only common carriers have much chance of being reimbursed for
the discount from the Universal Service Fund.


Sources: FARNET Washington Update, July 12; New York Times, Oct. 21 D5;
Benton Foundation; Edupage, Sept. 17

                    -----------------------


                    INFORMATION RENAISSANCE

In an effort to broaden the constituency of those most likely to
respond to the FCC's request for comments , Information
Renaissance recently organized an experimental five-week online
seminar on Universal Service/Network Democracy. Information
Renaissance (http://info-ren.pitt.edu) is a Pittsburgh based nonprofit
that promotes the development of regional networking infrastructure
in support of education, community development and economic
revitalization.

The point of the exercise was to educate, galvanize and involve
more on-the-ground practitioners in the FCC comments process. As
the organizers put it: "By surveying individual participants, we have
come to the conclusion that our group represents over 2000 person-
years of networking experience. This probably represents a greater
level of networking expertise than was contained in the hundreds
of industry-sponsored submissions to the FCC on the subject of
Universal Service."

Initial feedback indicates that it is important to continue such
educational activity to ensure that Federal officials developing rules
for implementing Universal Service have access to the opinions of
those who are engaged with telecommunications technology in
local schools and libraries. A similar seminar may well take place at
the time of the release of the Joint Board's comments, when there
will again be time for public comments.

Information Renaissance organizers point out that there will be a
mandated review of the success of the Telecommunications Act in
providing advanced services to schools and librarians and public
discussion of this topic could be invaluable in helping the FCC to
ascertain what has happened in the field.

                            -------


                            NET DAY

As a supplement to the FCC's efforts and the E-Rate campaign,
NetDay is an opportunity for corporations and ordinary citizens to
volunteer and to work together to wire all the nation's classrooms.

The first NetDay occurred in California, March 9, 1996, when over
20,000 volunteers and 200 businesses installed six million feet of
wire to connect classrooms in 2,600 schools. Throughout the entire
month of March 4,000 schools were wired, leaving 9,000 still to be
completed in California.

National NetDay96 (www.netday96.com/) was launched September
26. This fall the goal is to connect five schoolrooms and the library
in every school. There are actually several NetDays--different series
of Saturdays running from September through November. Each
state has a home-page, accessed from a clickable map on the
national NetDay page. Follow-up appears generally well-organized:
each school is encouraged to keep its own on-line NetDay diary and
build a technology plan (entirely consonant with the FCC's plans)
(http://www.netday96.com/whats_next_usa/).

California has an extraordinary zoomable organizing map used for
its second NetDay on October 12. "The First Visual Accounting of
Technology in California Schools,"
(http://www.netday96.com/map/) shows where help is needed. A
potential volunteer organizer can zoom from a map of the entire
state down to street level showing how to get to a school that needs
help. Once people sign up for a given school the red dots indicating
"help!" automatically change through yellow indicating "1-4
volunteers," to green showing that over four volunteers have
signed up.

NetDay News (http://www.schoolwire.org/), this project's lively
newsletter, is currently organizing an e-mail campaign to the FCC to
adopt the E-Rate proposal
(http://www.mightymedia.com/netday/netday.cfm).

Principally the invention of John Gage of Sun Microsystems,
NetDay received a boost from the Clinton Administration when it
organized a meeting on educational technology in California
schools in September, 1995. NetDay quickly became the centerpiece
for the President's Educational Technology Initiative
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/edtech.html ) incorporating several
other initiatives (including a Technology Literacy Challenge,
Virtual Office Hours). Details of these and other projects can also be
found at the web page for the Department of Education's
Technology Initiatives
(http://www.ed.gov/Technology/index.html).


                  ----------------------------


                  OPEN STUDIO: THE ARTS ONLINE


In all of this activity, you will have noticed that the arts have not
been mentioned. One of the goals of NINCH is that museums, arts
centers and arts institutions be included in such access programs.

One new project that will help to do this is a collaboration between
the National Endowment for the Arts and the Benton Foundation.
Named "Open Studio: The Arts Online," the program will establish
public points of access to the Internet at arts and cultural
institutions throughout the country. In addition, critically
important training programs will enable artists and arts institutions
to become effective information providers on the World Wide
Web.

Budgeted at $1 million annually, Open Studio: The Arts Online
(http://www.openstudio.org/) is designed to explore the tools and
techniques that will help arts and cultural organizations actively
participate in the networked environment. The project will
promote access to the Internet and to arts and cultural information
through a two-part process:

1.  One hundred Access Sites will be created, offering free Internet
access for artists and the public in arts organizations, libraries and
community centers. Two sites in each state and territory of the
United States will be selected to maximize geographic, income, and
ethnic diversity and each identified site will receive a small award
(up to $4,000) to establish public Internet access in their community.

The first set of sites has just been announced; a second set will be
announced in February:

       Beacon Street Gallery, Chicago, IL
       Cambridge Community TV (CCTV), Cambridge, MA
       DiverseWorks Artspace, Houston, TX
       Hult Center for the Performing Arts, Eugene, OR
       Lewis & Clark Library, Helena, MT
       Metro/Dade Cultural Affairs Council, Miami, FL
       Minneapolis Institute of Arts, Minneapolis, MN
       Schomburg Library, New York, NY
       Telluride Institute/InfoZone, Telluride, CO
       Topeka & Shawnee County Public Library, Topeka, KS
       911 Media Arts Center, Seattle, WA

2.  A system of community web mentoring sites will be established
to provide arts organizations and individual artists with the basic
skills needed for online communications and electronic publishing.
Each mentoring site will receive support (up to $35,000) to train
nonprofit arts organizations and individual artists. These trainees,
in turn, will each be asked to train another organization or artist in
an "each one teach one" strategy.

Three pilot mentor sites have already been selected, others will be
announced in February, 1997:

       Break Away Technologies, Los Angeles, CA
       Center for Arts Management & Technology, Pittsburgh, PA
       Charlotte's Web, Charlotte, NC

Organizations may apply to be either access or mentoring sites. The
deadline for applications is December 8, 1996 and the
announcement of award recipients will be made by February 1997.






===============================================================

David L. Green
Executive Director
NATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR A NETWORKED CULTURAL HERITAGE
21 Dupont Circle, NW
Washington DC 20036
www-ninch.cni.org
[log in to unmask]
202/296-5346                                  202/872-0884 fax

==============================================================

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager