i agree with heather. just took a look at the 'offending' article, and it is
a review of 3 books, not just one, and it would not be possible to cull out
which of the notes at the end were about the Ankori book and which were
about the other two.
also, removing it will remove material from the article that is on previous
pages.
there is also a sentence at the bottom of the letter we received from CAA
saying that "as far as practicable' that any reference to said review be
removed from any index??? are they kidding??? hopefully we can assume that
as librarians we have no control over that one!!
Anne Haas
Art Librarian
Bowdoin College
Brunswick, Maine.
On 6/18/08 8:43 AM, "Heather Gendron" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Perhaps it would be reasonable to tip in a note that explains CAA's
> situation? To "remove" the entire review from the print version would
> mean removing other unrelated material.
__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
For information about joining ARLIS/NA see:
http://www.arlisna.org/join.html
Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Judy Dyki) at: [log in to unmask]
|