LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  December 2005

ARLIS-L December 2005

Subject:

Weeding for remote storage compilation (greatest hits!)

From:

Liv Valmestad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Liv Valmestad <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:41:25 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (210 lines)

Hello,

Thanks to everyone who sent me suggestions for weeding for remote storage.
Some have asked me to post my results to the list, so ta da, here it is!

Liv

***************
I have a small storage area from which we page particular
journal titles.  The decision to put ceased periodicals (all very low
use, of course, and several that are available electronically) into
storage was pretty easy and straigtforward.  Somewhat more difficult was
my decision to put some back issues of currently published periodicals
into storage.  I only put issues prior to 2000 in storage, and once
again selected low use titles.  We only page issues every other month or
so - less frequently than I had anticipated.

The space was already there, so I didn't have to estimate space
requirements.  Instead, my choices were based on the space available to
me.
***********************
Dear Liv,
We here at LACMA moved a significant number of our serials to our storage
facility last year. The staff identified titles that were seldom used and a
check-list was created that we then discussed (but we have a small staff and
everyone does reference). Most of what is in storage are non-active serials.
For those titles that are current we kept the latest 2 years in the main
library. The most difficult part of the project was changing the locations!
*********************
The Univ. of Pa. library system opened a remote storage facility
a few years ago.  The Fisher Fine Arts Library staff have, so far,
done one major weed/transfer to storage.  The major decision-maker
for that process is on leave at the moment, but I can tell you:

- we tried to transfer (or, in a limited no. of cases, withdraw)
  all duplicate copies of books, unless we knew (from circulation
  records, reserve use, plain old experience) that there was a
  clear demand for them.

- we transferred pre-1980 volumes of many journals to storage, but
  we did not transfer any back volumes of the most important/heavily
  used journals in any of our core fields (fine arts, architecture,
  landscape architecture, city planning).  The library storage
  facility is willing to photocopy or scan wanted articles from storage
  journals, and entire volumes can be shipped to any point in the
  system for use by individuals.

- many old, folio-sized books were sent to storage.  I had misgivings about
  parting with some of these--not because they were used much, but because
  they are old and probably hard-to-replace.  The storage facility's
  policy for making material available strikes me as too relaxed to be
  appropriate for such material.

- a lot of material acquired pre-1968 and classed in Dewey was transferred
  to storage.  A few items discovered during that process were sent
  instead to our rare book collection.  I wish we had been able to
scrutinize
  the Deweys more closely before transferring them, but then, I'm a
notorious
  pack-rat!  I know that the burden of examining this stuff, even briefly,
was
  a heavy one for our head and assistant librarians, who also are the
principal
  bibliographers for our fields.

- we didn't weed our reference and "locked case" collections,
  but we'll have to do so eventually due to lack of space).

- printed volumes of major periodical indexes which have gone electronic
  *were* sent to storage, rather than being discarded.

- we did offer the faculty in our major disciplines an opportunity to
  provide input.  As you can imagine, most who bothered to respond wanted
  *their* discipline's material to be left alone.  I can't say how
  this sort of thing was resolved.

So far, the process seems to have been a success (though who knows what
transferred material has since disappeared or been mis-handled?).  It
bought us some time, but the space is rapidly filling up again.  A second,
more drastic round is coming soon.

************************
I have experienced storage facilities in all four of the libraries I have
worked in my career!

At Dartmouth College, it was one of the most drastic experiences, as so much
had to be sent.  We sent back runs of journals, but didn't have a set cutoff
date for this reason.  Some journals needed to have all the volumes on site.
Some journals wer fat and less important (e.g. Architectural Digest), so
there was a more recent cutoff date.  Some journals are skinny and more
important, so had an earlier cutoff date.  It seemed to make more sense
practically, even though it lost any consistent cutoff to remember.

In addition, we sent books to storage.  At first it was some books that were
not reclassified to LC.  Eventually all of these went.  Finally, so as to do
only one more shift of the entire collection, we sent NK-TP and TS-Z to
storage, including all new books that arrived.  That took up more space in
storage, because it was a growing collection, but it was temporary until
more space was obtained.  The books did end up coming back!   But having a
call number range all in storage is less bad for users than having some
selected books removed that are not browsable.  But maybe you won't have to
cut that deep.

All your other questions are good, and you will think up others as you go
along.  Good luck.
******************

I was involved in a massive removal-to-storage project, on an ongoing
basis, when I worked at UCLA in the 1990s.  A summary of my advice would
include:

Avoid at all cost moving oversized materials of any kind to storage
(they are easily damaged in transit).
Bound journals more than 10 (possibly 15) years old are good candidates
for storage.
Journals that are no longer being published (or non-current
subscriptions) are also good candidates -- the full run can go.
(Remember that journals and subscriptions die because of lack of
interest.)
Duplicate copies are excellent candidates for storage (don't be
persuaded to discard duplicates of art books/journals because art
volumes wear out and are hard to replace)
Before discarding anything due to electronic "duplication," be very sure
that the electronic version is stable for the long haul (for example,
JSTOR).  Never discard titles on the basis of their inclusion in
aggregated databases.
Yes, work on a title by title basis.  Feel free to make exceptions to
your own rules, but bear in mind that its easier on patrons if some
simple rule is followed so that they can remember what is supposed to be
in storage.
Bear in mind that you may run across rare items that need to be removed
to some special location.

At UCLA -- and this applies to books, not journals -- we isolated stuff
for storage on holding shelves for a month before taking action.  That
way, all the librarians had time to reconsider removal. I think that
worked out well.

Paula Gabbard may have more advice.  She moderated a session on storage
strategies at an ARLIS/NA conference some years back.

***********************
Here at the University of Georgia we have a book repository off campus.
The criteria for sending journals are very close to your ideas
mentioned.  In general we sent non research journals first, keeping the
last 15 years if not available electronically.  If available
electronically you may decide that 3 - 5 years of back issues are enough
to keep in the stacks.  For art journals I used the periodical list in
Guide to the Literature of Art History.  I have kept almost every volume
of every title that appears on that list in the main stacks.  Although
some other bibliographers have sent back issues of journals that are in
full text in some of our databases I have postponed doing that since the
quality of the images are not as good as in the print sources.  So far
we have had enough room for that.  In the future I imaging I will be
sending those too.
********************

If you have serial/journal titles that are "dead" those are good
candidates for storage.
****************
One tool which will be quite handy for information regarding indexing and
electonic
access to full text is JAKE (http://www.jake-db.org/).  If you have any
questions about
JAKE, let me know... I'm happy to share what I know.

****************
We've been sending stuff to storage (ours is called the Satellite
Shelving Facility) for the last four years.  There's always a tension
between wanting to send lots of stuff to make lots of room, and wanting
to keep stuff for people to use.  Will you easily be able to retrieve
things from storage for patrons? That makes a big difference.

For most journals, we've got a cut off date of 5 years.  We keep the
volumes from the last five years for most journals; older volumes have
been sent to storage, and every year or two we send more volumes away to
keep to that five year limit.  We do also keep complete runs of some of
the more important journals.  Short runs of journals that we don't get
anymore have also been sent away as well. So even if some of those
volumes were within the 5 year limit, we sent the complete set because
no new issues were coming in and eventually it all would have been over
there anyway.   We have about 200 journals, and basically I and the
staff person who handles the journals just went through the list and
decided whether or not a particular title needed special attention (did
it all need to be kept, or go entirely to storage), or whether we could
just treat it with the 5 year limit.

For books, there was a whole list of criteria, and a long process of
review.  I've attached the text of an email I sent to the faculty about
stuff being moved to Satellite.

It's never easy or fun to send materials to storage, but I think the
thing to be most careful of is to make sure the faculty have some input
or are forewarned about the process.  They complained a lot the first
time we sent stuff away, but I think they're aware of the issue now, and
while they still don't like it (and neither do I), they're resigned to
it.  We will hopefully be getting an expanded facility in the next year
or two, so that will be a big help.   If you have any more questions, or
if this isn't clear, let me know.

__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
For information about joining ARLIS/NA see:
        http://www.arlisna.org/join.html
Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
        to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
       http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager