I know I've had this discussion, off list, with one member before. But as
this has come up before, I decided to add my two cents worth to this
discussion.

To start with, I really don't have a problem following LC on this, as E-F
are for traditional Native American art, and these objects were first and
foremost collected for their value as cultural objects. One still finds them
closely associated with anthropology or natural history collections and
displays, and it still makes a great deal of sense to have these titles
shelved with the broader scope of Native American material for most
libraries, and especially for scienced based institutions like mine.

Additionally, LC instructs one to use the N schedule for modern NA art
(i.e. art created for arts sake). If you look at Table N5, you have 38.A4
assigned for American Indians, which signifies that anytime you build a
number using the N schedule you have the provision to bring out the ethnic
aspect. Again, look under Canada and you have 49.5.A54 for American
Indians.

That said, if you were to class all of your NA materials in the N schedule,
I would think you would just catalog them all as if they were modern artists
for your collection. 




Kent C. Boese
Arts Cataloger
Smithsonian Institution Libraries
P.O. Box 37012
NHB 30 - MRC 154
Washington, DC 20013-7012

tel. (202) 357-3161
fax. (202) 357-4532
[log in to unmask]

>>> Ellen Chapman <[log in to unmask]> 07/31/03 03:51PM >>>
When I was a new librarian, a long-time colleague told me that a lot of
the first publications on Native Americans were considered part of
American history, thus classifed in "E" by Lib. of Congress. Many of
these early publications concern what is now considered native American
"art" but were originally seen as historical/anthropological (e.g. the
Smithsonian series). Perhaps since the "E" classification held most of the
early material, LC just kept putting putting things in that class without
bothering to create a new number in the "N" class. It may also have
something to do with the question/concern/argument about artifacts being
seen as "art" by outsiders while the creators of them see them as
spiritual or utilitarian objects. The latter view would be appropriate for
the "E" class. Of course that doesn't account for modern art created by
Native Americans for exhibit/sale in the modern American art scene. And
the LC classification system, has plenty of quirks that defy explanation,
as all systems do. Your students will have to search the catalog or
consult a librarian (gasp!) and not rely only on browsing the stacks.

In my library, many books on ancient Hawaii are in the "DU" class (Pacific
region) and include lots of items westerners consider "art" but were
created for spiritual or utilitarian purposes. Books on modern art made by
native Hawaiians are in "N" and books on specific crafts are in other
classes
(e.g. musical instuments=M; lei making=T).  Aloha.

|((|  Ellen Chapman
|))|  Archivist, Senator Spark M. Matsunaga Papers
|((|  Hawaii Congressional Papers Collection
|))|  http://libweb.hawaii.edu/libdept/congressional/ 
|((|  University of Hawaii at Manoa Library

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Leslie Andersen wrote:

> Hi - As a rather new *art* librarian (not new to librarianship but new
> to collection development in art) I am puzzled as to why books on Native
> American art and artists are classed in E 98 instead of the N's. I
> notice that no other ethnicities (such as Asian-American art,
> African-American art, etc.) are classed there. Can anyone shed some
> light on this for me? I'm concerned that my students are never going to
> find biographical information on Native-Americans there. Thanks very much
-
>
> Leslie
>
> --
> ñ°ñ  `  ñ°,++,°ñ  `  ñ°ñ  `  ñ°,++,°ñ  ` 
ñ°ñ  `  ñ°ñ
> Leslie Andersen
> Arts Librarian
> California State University, Long Beach
> 1250 Bellflower Blvd.
> Long Beach, CA  90840-1901
> 562-985-5529 (voice)
> 562-985-1703 (
FAX)
> [log in to unmask] 
> To schedule a lecture:
http://scheduler.library.csulb.edu/LibInstrSessRequest.asp 
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] 
> For information about joining ARLIS/NA see:
>         http://www.arlisna.org//membership.html 
> Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
>         to [log in to unmask] 
> ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
>        http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html 
> Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at:
[log in to unmask] 
>

__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask] 
For information about joining ARLIS/NA see:
        http://www.arlisna.org//membership.html 
Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
        to [log in to unmask] 
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
       http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html 
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at:
[log in to unmask]

__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
For information about joining ARLIS/NA see:
        http://www.arlisna.org//membership.html
Send administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
        to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
       http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]