LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  April 2002

ARLIS-L April 2002

Subject:

Elred v. Ashcroft

From:

Barbara Rockenbach <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Barbara Rockenbach <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 9 Apr 2002 17:16:59 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (155 lines)

Dear Colleagues,

Below is an interesting update on the Elred v. Ashcroft case from the DFC list.


-----------------------------------------------
The American Bar Association Section on Intellectual Property Law is trying
to get the ABA to sign-off on an Amicus Brief, supporting the
constitutionality of the extension of the copyright term, in Eldred v.
Ashcroft.  This is the 11th time in 40 years the copyright term has been
extended, in this case "work for hire" copyrights, held by corporations such
as Disney (the firm that lobbied the most for the extension) are extended to
95 years.   Eldred, represented by Larry Lessig, is asking the court to
declare the extension unconstitutional, because it makes a mockery of the
Constitutional provision that copyright be available for "limited times."

The group pushing for this within the ABA include a number of persons who
represent the motion picture, music and publishing industries, including
Judy Saffer (assistant general counsel, BMI), Donna Gies (West Publishing),
Mary L. Kevlin (Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, a firm that represents Columbia
Pictures, Universal Studios, Random House, BMG Entertainment, RCA Records,
Sony Music and others), Hayden Gregory (legislative consultant, former chief
counsel of the House Judiciary subcommittee on intellectual property), Mike
Jakes (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, a firm that
represents Walt Disney), Cynthia Kernick (Reed Smith, represented eight
movie studios in the ICraveTV suit) and Gale R. (Pete) Peterson  (head of
the intellectual property law department of the San Antonio firm of Cox &
Smith).

In the ABA IP section notice about the case quote Mort Goldberg (see his
bio here: http://www.cll.com/attorneys/bio.cfm?attyid=46)  as saying"


    "The case could present a field day for
    those who have an anti-IP sentiment--
    those who say information wants to be free,
    less protection is necessarily better, the public
    domain promotes the progress of science and
    useful arts better than IP, and when technology
    advances, IP rights must be cut back."

Goldberg apparently is alarmed by all of those things.   But the more basic
issue is how can anyone justify a 95 year work-for-hire copyright term?
There certainly is no economic theory or moral justification for this.   ABA
members should intervene to stop the ABA from using its member's names to
protect a handful of firms that are lobbying for the 95 year copyright term.
Here is the ABA IP section notice of the proposed brief.

 http://www.abanet.org/intelprop/apr02chair.html


ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

CHAIR=S BULLETIN

Vol. 6 No. 8

APRIL 2002

From the Chair

Section Prepares To Submit Amicus Brief To Supreme Court On
Constitutionality Of Copyright Law

Charles P. Baker

Section Chair, 2001-02

When the Supreme Court on February 25 granted certiorari to hear a case
involving the constitutionality of a recent copyright statute, many of us
were surprised. Talking with copyright experts in our Section, however, it
became plain that this case will probably be a major one for copyrights as
well as other forms of intellectual property.

As Past Section Chair Mort Goldberg of New York said,  This is one of the
most important copyright cases the Court has decided to hear in many
decades-- indeed, it may rank with cases like Graham v. John Deere, Kewanee
Oil v. Bicron Corp., Diamond v. Chakrabarty, and The Trademark Cases [1879].
The case could present a field day for those who have an anti-IP sentiment--
those who say information wants to be free, less protection is necessarily
better, the public domain promotes the progress of science and useful arts
better than IP, and when technology advances, IP rights must be cut back.@

The Section immediately began the process of obtaining the two ABA approvals
required for submission of an amicus brief on behalf of the ABA. ABA policy
approval is required, and approval by ABA Standing Committee on Amicus
Curiae Briefs is required. The schedule was tight-- only a few weeks to
obtain the approvals in order to have enough time to prepare the brief.

With guidance from Judy Saffer of New York, who chairs the Section's
Copyright Division, Donna Gies of Eagan, Minnesota, and her Copyright
Legislation Committee, and Mary Kevlin of New York, and her Authors
Committee, prepared reports and resolutions in about ten days for voting on
by their respective committees. As this column is being written, those
reports and votes are being sent to the Section's Council, which will meet
by telephone conference to consider and adopt a position. Our Section
Director Betsi Roach and Legislative Consultant Hayden Gregory will then
have a few days to prepare a submission to the ABA Executive Committee,
which can adopt ABA policy when the Board of Governors and the House of
Delegates are not available. We trust the Executive Committee will agree
that the Section's position, supported by the reports of Donna and Mary's
committees, is sound, and it will become ABA policy.

Simultaneously, the Section's own Amicus Briefs Committee, chaired by Mike
Jakes of Washington, DC, and Cynthia Kernick of Pittsburgh, under the
leadership of Pete Peterson of San Antonio, chair of the Section's
Litigation Division, are preparing the detailed submission required for
approval by the ABA Amicus Committee.

Turning to the substance of the case, Eldred v. Ashcroft, 239 F.3d 373 (D.C.
Cir. 2001), upheld the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, which the
Section successfully urged Congress to adopt pursuant to a Section
resolution based on the Report of Committee 301B Copyright Legislation. That
legislation extended the term of copyright protection from 50 years after
death of an author to 70 years, or from 75 years to 95 years for corporate
copyright holders. Congress based the extension on its power under the
Constitution to secure for "limited times" exclusive property rights for
inventors and creators of original works. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
rejected a contention that the extended period was longer than needed "to
promote the progress of science" and the arts. The questions on which
certiorari was granted are,

1. Did the D.C. Circuit err in holding that Congress has the power under the
Copyright Clause to extend retrospectively the term of existing copyrights?

2. Is a law that extends the term of existing and future copyrights
"categorically immune from challenge under the First Amendment"?

The real world issues at stake are the many works that are still used in a
consistent way by their owners and are important sources of revenue. These
would enter the public domain 20 years earlier if copyright extension laws
are declared unconstitutional. People like Eric Eldred, the plaintiff, whose
website publishes public domain works, object to such extensions as being
retroactive. Those who support the defendant contend that without copyright
protection, people could not afford to be creative, and this extension,
which brings U.S. law closer to the law in Europe, does not mean that
extensions will go on forever.

--Barbara (on behalf of the Public Policy Committe)
Barbara Rockenbach, Instructional Services Librarian
Arts Library
Yale University
180 York St.
P.O. Box 208242
New Haven, CT 06520-8242
phone: (203) 432-7074   fax: (203) 432-0549

__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
Administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
        to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
       http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager