LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  September 2001

ARLIS-L September 2001

Subject:

Notes of Sept. 7 MAC discussion group mtg.

From:

Amy Trendler <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ART LIBRARIES SOCIETY DISCUSSION LIST <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:04:39 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

The minutes and information about upcoming meetings are also
available on our web site at
http://alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/~trendler/macdg.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Midwestern Art Cataloging Discussion Group
Notes for the 1st Meeting
Hosted by the Ryerson and Burnham Libraries
September 7, 2001
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The first meeting of the Midwestern Art Cataloging Discussion Group
convened at 10:40am on Friday September 7, 2001 at the Art Institute
of Chicago. Nearly twenty-five catalogers were in attendance.

1.  The first topic of discussion was the issue of electronic
resources and their relationship to the catalog. In particular, the
question of whether online resources should appear in records in the
catalog if they also appear in a separate online or electronic
resources page on a library's web site was discussed. The situation
of the Ryerson and Burnham Libraries, which serves a variety of
audiences with different levels of access, was highlighted. On the
one hand the idea of the catalog as a record of all resources owned
or accessed by the library is attractive, but on the other hand the
reality of the complicated availability of some of these resources to
users makes such an approach difficult. Some suggestions for dealing
with different levels of access in bibliographic records included
explanatory notes, and citing the URL but making it inactive (for
cases in which only the reference staff may access a resource). It
was also suggested that BI sessions and sites could make users aware
of online resources instead of including records for these resources
in the catalog.

It was noted that the University of Chicago original or copy catalogs
many online resources, both fee-based web services and "free" web
sites chosen by selectors or requested by users. Aggregator databases
are the only exception to this policy, and in this case the library
is looking into purchasing bibliographic records from the vendors for
the parts of their aggregate products. For those sites with
restricted access notes are sometimes added to the bibliographic
records along the lines of "available to subscribing institutions
only."

2.  The changes in LCSH for art and architecture were discussed. A
quick overview of the changes prefaced progress reports. [For more
information on the changes themselves, see the instruction sheets
(http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/artcat.html), the  weekly lists on
the CPSO's web site beginning with Weekly List 05, Jan. 31, 2001
(http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/ ). For examples of the changes,
see Sherman Clarke's web site
(http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/9783/artcat/revshex.html)]
Most libraries have switched to the new format for new records, but
not all have begun changing headings on older records. Approaches to
the changes varied:  some had to make the changes to records on a
individual basis, some have library systems that can make global
changes, and some consortium members must wait for their consortia to
make the changes. It was noted that duplication of headings results
when using global change functions, but this was considered less
important than making the change to the new format.

3.  The relationship between visual resources and online catalogs was
discussed. The Northwestern University Art History Slide Library
catalog has been available online as a Voyager catalog for a year
now. The catalog is not integrated with the main library's catalog,
but the slide library's catalog is offered as a link from the main
library's page. In the future digital slides will be available in the
catalog, but access to these will be restricted. Since the catalog
has been made available more off-site and non-art history users have
used the collection, placing somewhat of a strain on the staff, but
these patrons tend to use different parts of the collection than the
art history department.

4.  The issue of image protection was raised. It was noted that the
Berkeley slide library restricts images by size--offering only a
thumbnail image. More often slide libraries watermark images or
restrict access to members of the institution. It was noted that
slide librarians try to work with copyright restrictions, but there
is not enough staff time to deal with rights in such a way as to make
the library's holdings available to all. As a result, there is a
great deal of repetition among holdings because images are not
accessible outside of each institution. The AMICO database and
similar projects may be the wave of the future, providing a basic
collection that is enhanced by images acquired for local demand.

5.  MARC for images was discussed. The Northwestern University Art
History Slide Library has mapped MARC to the VRA core tags. Columbia
College is beginning a project to map their old format to MARC and
convert their database. Clean up of the newly mapped and converted
records will be a significant part of the project.  Columbia will
also be converting from a local thesaurus to LCSH for their image
collection. Northwestern University has been successful in using LCSH
for images although occasionally fudging with LCSH to create more
appropriate headings of their images.

6.  The question of an all digital image collection was brought up.
Most felt there was a long way to go before this becomes a reality.
The cost, technical limitations, the need for electronic classrooms,
and traditional methods of teaching art history were cited as factors
against digital image only collections. The portability of slides and
projectors and the fact that slides were used in spaces outside the
art history classroom were also mentioned. On the other hand, some
have found that a push for digital images has come from within art
history departments where multiple users often compete for the same
images.


The next meeting of the MAC discussion group is tentatively scheduled
for December at Columbia College.

Notes by Amy Trendler.
9/17/01
--
-----------------------------
Amy E. Trendler
Catalog/Reference Librarian
Ryerson and Burnham Libraries
Art Institute of Chicago
(312)443-3600 ext. 3-7343
[log in to unmask]

__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
Administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
        to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
       http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager