LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L Archives

ARLIS-L Archives


ARLIS-L@LSV.ARLISNA.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L Home

ARLIS-L  June 2001

ARLIS-L June 2001

Subject:

Copyright, New Media Law & E-Commerce News (Vol. 5 no. 2)

From:

Roger Lawson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ART LIBRARIES SOCIETY DISCUSSION LIST <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:06:50 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (162 lines)

>>> "Lesley Ellen Harris" <[log in to unmask]> 06/04/01 05:46PM >>>
FROM THE OFFICES OF LESLEY ELLEN HARRIS

Copyright, New Media Law & E-Commerce News

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Vol. 5, No. 2, June 4, 2001

ISSN 1489-954X

Contents:


    1.. Studies, Legislation and Conventions:
    New online child pornography law in Canada

    China clamps down on piracy and copyright infringement

    WIPO Conference discusses broadcasting rights

    U.S. distance education legislation

    Proposed U.S. database protection legislation

    2.. Legal Cases:
    Chinese e-newspaper fined for violating copyright

    U.S. Copyright Office rules on net radio dispute

    Van Gogh Web sites in rights fight

    Montreal copyshop found in contempt of court

    3.. E-Commerce:
    Amazon and Adobe team up to offer e-books

    Internet radio for kids

    Music label releases copyright-protected CD

    4.. Of Interest:
    Netherlands organization introduces music licensing for

    Internet and cell phones

    WIPO seeks input into Internet domain name process

    New model license agreement

    5.. Seminars:
    Digital licensing seminar in Philadelphia

    6.. Publications:
How to be a better negotiator in the digital realm

Copyright and New Media Law Newsletter editorial



__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Copyright, New Media & E-Commerce News is distributed for free by the office of Lesley Ellen Harris. Information contained herein should not be relied upon or considered as legal advice. Copyright 2001 Lesley Ellen Harris. This newsletter may be forwarded, downloaded or reproduced in whole in any print or electronic format for non-commercial purposes provided that its author is acknowledged and that you cc: [log in to unmask]

This newsletter is archived with the National Library of Canada at:

http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/201/300/copyright/index.html 

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

    1.. STUDIES, LEGISLATION AND CONVENTIONS:
    NEW ONLINE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY LAW IN CANADA - In March 2001, the Canadian government introduced Bill C-15, which targets sexual exploitation via the Internet. The proposed legislation includes provisions that would make it a crime "to transmit, make available, export and intentionally access child pornography on the Internet", and allow judges to order the deletion of child pornography posted on computer systems in Canada. The text of the Bill is at: http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/chambus/house/bills/government/C-15/C-15_1/C-15TOCE.html.

    CHINA CLAMPS DOWN ON PIRACY AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT - The Chinese government is considering changes to its copyright laws to protect copyright on the Internet, outlaw the decoding of software encryption, and ban the removal of any copyright information on a product. The full story is at http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cover/storydb/2001/04/17/it-cnmcopyright.html.

    WIPO CONFERENCE DISCUSSES BROADCASTING RIGHTS - Responding to worldwide piracy problems, the fifth session of the World Intellectual Property Organization's ("WIPO") Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights ("SCCR"), affirmed its commitment to protecting the rights of broadcasting organizations. The Committee also discussed the protection of so-called "non-original" databases, like telephone books, that do not qualify for copyright since their content is not sufficiently original. Since this kind of material can be expensive to compile, yet easy to reproduce, the Committee felt that some protection might be required, although further discussion will be necessary. More information is at http://www.wipo.int/news/en/ - click on pressroom, then updates.

    U.S. DISTANCE EDUCATION LEGISLATION - On May 17, 2001, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee approved S. 487, Technology, Education and Copyright Harmonization Act of 2001. The TEACH Act, as it has become known, would broaden the U.S. Copyright Act exemption for instructional broadcasting to include distance education, although this would only apply to "mediated instructional activities."

    PROPOSED U.S. DATABASE PROTECTION LEGISLATION - A series of meetings is currently taking place in an effort to produce new database protection legislation in the U.S. The meetings are organized by the chairmen of the House Judiciary and Energy and Commerce Committees and are moderated by staff from both Committees. The meetings are open to interested parties and House staff, and are taking place over an eight-week period ending on June 7, 2001.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    2.. LEGAL CASES:
    CHINESE E-NEWSPAPER FINED FOR VIOLATING COPYRIGHT - A Beijing Court recently ruled that The Xiamen Commercial Report, a Chinese E-newspaper, violated a journalist's copyright by plagiarizing his story. The newspaper published a slightly altered version of Zhao Jun's story, changing the name of the writer to Chen Jiali. The Xiamen Commercial Report told the Court that it had copied the story from the Internet, but was unable to show the Court the original Web site.

    U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE RULES ON NET RADIO DISPUTE - In an April ruling, the U.S. Copyright Office ruled in favor of the Recording Industry Association of America when it decided that radio broadcasters are not exempt from licensing royalties when they simulcast their programs on the Internet.

    VAN GOGH WEB SITES IN RIGHTS FIGHT - David Brooks, a computer programmer from Toronto and creator of the comprehensive Vincent van Gogh Gallery (http://www.vangoghgallery.com), is starting legal proceedings against the owner of another van Gogh site, About van Gogh Art (http://www.about-van-gogh-art.com). Brooks, who scanned reproductions of over 2000 van Gogh paintings, sketches and drawings over the five years it took him to build his site, claims that the rival site re-posted many of these paintings without his permission. The lawyer for the rival site has said that Brooks is claiming rights over intellectual property that he does not own. Brooks recently hired a lawyer in the Netherlands to try to force the rival site's Dutch owner to remove the offending images on the grounds of database copyright infringement, which is illegal in the European Union. For the full story, see http://www.iht.com/articles/20310.htm.

    MONTREAL COPYSHOP FOUND IN CONTEMPT OF COURT - U Compute, a Montreal copyshop, has been found in contempt of court for ignoring an earlier copyright infringement decision. The copyshop was found liable for breach of copyright after evidence showed it was copying entire textbooks for sale to students. CANCOPY, ITP Nelson, McGraw-Hill Ryerson and Prentice-Hall Canada brought the successful motion for contempt when they discovered that the copyshop was continuing to sell its photocopied textbooks, breaching a "wide injunction" which prevented the copyshop from making, selling or distributing unauthorized copies of copyright protected works.

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    3.. E-COMMERCE:
    AMAZON AND ADOBE TEAM UP TO OFFER E-BOOKS - In April, Amazon began to offer almost 2,000 titles using Adobe Systems' eBook Reader software. The new venture doubles the number of titles available through Amazon.com's e-book section. See Adobe's press release at http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200104/20010410amazon.html.

    INTERNET RADIO FOR KIDS - Playhouse Radio, a new Internet radio station for parents and their children aged 0-8, debuts officially on June 16, 2001. Listeners can find hundreds of songs from around the world, searchable by simple key words like "bath time", "trucks" or "zoo". Sneak previews of the site are available by clicking on media visitors at http://www.playhouseradio.com.

    MUSIC LABEL RELEASES COPYRIGHT-PROTECTED CD - Music City Records is releasing new signing Charley Pride's latest CD in a high-tech format designed to prevent the songs from appearing on Napster. Encryption technology from SunnComm prevents people from copying the CD on a CD burner or downloading to Napster in digital format. The CD can be downloaded to MP3, but only after a buyer registers his or her copy of the CD. For more on this story, see http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-5924584.html?tag=st.ne.1005.saslnk.sase.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    4.. OF INTEREST
    NETHERLANDS ORGANIZATION INTRODUCES MUSIC LICENSING FOR INTERNET AND CELL PHONES - BUMA/ STEMRA has introduced regulations on collective rights reimbursements for the use of music on the Internet (simulcasting, Webcasting and background music). The Dutch copyright organization has also introduced a regulation on downloading music and sounds for cell phone ring tones.

    WIPO SEEKS INPUT INTO INTERNET DOMAIN NAME PROCESS - The World Intellectual Property Organization ("WIPO") invites comments on its Interim Report on Internet domain names, and on the draft recommendations contained in the Report. The full text of the Interim Report, together with an online submission form, is at http://wipo2.wipo.int/process2/rfc/index.html. Comments should be submitted by June 8, 2001.

    NEW MODEL LICENSE AGREEMENT - On May 1, 2001, The Liblicense Standard Licensing Agreement was released at http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/standlicagree.html. It is an attempt to reach a consensus on the basic terms of contracts for licensing digital content between university libraries and academic publishers. It is sponsored by the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Digital Library Foundation and Yale University Library, and is worth a look!

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    5.. SEMINARS
    DIGITAL LICENSING SEMINAR IN PHILADELPHIA - On Friday, June 8, 2001, Lesley Ellen Harris will be conducting a half day seminar on digital licensing in Philadelphia, sponsored by PALINET. In the seminar, which will be useful to all those involved in the use or licensing of digital materials, participants will be led through a clause-by-clause analysis of a typical licensing agreement. For more information, or to register online, go to http://www.palinet.org and click on "Workshops".

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    6.. PUBLICATIONS
HOW TO BE A BETTER NEGOTIATOR IN THE DIGITAL REALM - Lesley Ellen Harris' article on negotiating for digital rights is available online at http://www.gigalaw.com/articles/2001/harris-2001-04-p1.html. The article contains practical advice on how to negotiate contracts that involve digital rights, whether for software, databases or the Internet.

COPYRIGHT & NEW MEDIA LAW NEWSLETTER EDITORIAL - The editorial from Volume 5, Issue 1 of The Copyright & New Media Law Newsletter: For Libraries, Archives & Museums proved so popular that the full editorial is reproduced below. The Newsletter is now in its fifth year of publication, with contributors from around the world and subscribers from 20 countries. The newsletter helps you to keep abreast of important copyright issues and news, and to ensure practical solutions in your everyday activities. 2001 subscriptions are now available from http://copyrightlaws.com or email [log in to unmask] The subscription price includes four print issues, as well as free timely and frequent email alerts.

EDITORIAL - The Internet is making the world a much smaller place and when it comes to digital goods - products that can be reduced to a series of zeros and ones and squirt down a wire - there are no international borders. One question often asked in relation to the Internet and copyright law is whether there should be a single international copyright law. 

Although there is no single international copyright law, there is an international system of copyright that results in protecting copyright works at a minimum level in all countries that comply with this system (or belong to one or more of the copyright treaties.) At the current time, most countries belong to the Berne Copyright Convention (http://wipo.int) whose principle of national treatment means that you apply the law of the country where the work is used. This seems simple enough. If you photocopy an article by an American author in Canada, then you apply Canadian copyright law. If you publicly perform a work created by an Australian composer in France, then you apply French law. However, the question inevitably arises as to which country's laws apply in cases of copyright uses and infringement that take place on the Internet. As set out above, the country where the work is used is the applicable copyright law. However, with the Internet, it is sometimes difficult to establish where a work is used. Is it used where the work is uploaded onto a Web site, or where it is downloaded, or perhaps in other countries along the way? 

As recent court cases suggest, the question of which country has jurisdiction over the Internet is a source of much debate among legal scholars, law associations and courts around the world. The leading cases and commentaries are American.

Overall, the position on jurisdiction on the Internet seems to be based on a number of considerations:

  a.. Is there a connection between the location where the work was originally posted and the place where the infringement has occurred?
  b.. Are either of the countries of origin in which the sender or receiver of the impugned Internet activity located in signatory countries to an international agreement that would regulate this activity?
The answer, if there is one, appears to be that a jurisdictional analysis based on existing international law principles should be done to determine which country has jurisdiction over a particular Internet infringement. Until a specific international agreement is ratified by many influential nations, there does not seem to be a definitive way to answer the question of which country has jurisdiction over the Internet.

Does it make sense for countries to support a single international copyright law? And if so, what copyright principles would be followed in this law? Would we follow the U.S. law that allows for fair use and various exceptions, or would we follow the much more restrictive law of France which favors the rights of creators, or find a compromise position like in Canada? What about the requirements for "notice and takedown" provided in the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act? Are those provisions too burdensome to be applied by Internet Service Providers around the world?

What is becoming clear is that the worldwide trade in copyright protected materials is now moving to the Internet, where intellectual property including copyright law, taxation, border inspection, local anti-hate and freedom of speech laws are difficult to apply and often impossible to enforce. How can France, for example, successfully prevent the sale of Nazi memorabilia to the citizens of its country? No border patrol can intercept the infringing items. Similarly, how can the European Union ("EU") collect Value Added Tax ("VAT") taxes from software downloaded by EU residents from Web sites located in the United States? The answers to these questions are not easy, but it is clear that harmonization is in everyone's interest. Without it, the growth of digital commerce and dissemination of intellectual property in a digital form will clearly be impeded.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This newsletter is prepared by Lesley Ellen Harris, a Copyright and New Media Lawyer and Consultant. Lesley is the author of the books Canadian Copyright Law (McGrawHill) and Digital Property: Currency of the 21st Century (McGrawHill - see http://www.mcgrawhill.ca/digitalproperty) Lesley can be reached at [log in to unmask], and at http://copyrightlaws.com.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



This LEH-Letter issue was prepared with the help of Beth Davies.

__________________________________________________________________
Mail submissions to [log in to unmask]
Administrative matters (file requests, subscription requests, etc)
        to [log in to unmask]
ARLIS-L Archives and subscription maintenance:
       http://lsv.uky.edu/archives/arlis-l.html
Questions may be addressed to list owner (Kerri Scannell) at: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.ARLISNA.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager